Show MUST HI 1111 MV N 11 Such Is the tho loli In I tho the Tiui lcd 1 Cas CasIn In time tho caso easa of ot J 1 Folsom l ap op vs s William Aper ct et al nI admin of or the tile estate of ot A H n Raleigh deceased thu Ihu court today handed handell down an nn opinion reversing tin tho judgment of ot till tile lower ruurt and rc re reo tho time caso for tor a II new trial Tho The opinion of way was written ritten by Chief Justice JI Haskin and concurred In 11 by Justice and District Judge Booth tie The action nellon was brought to title to tn certain pieces of veal real estate In tho the tholly lly ity upon which defendant claimed a 11 aHen alien lien Hen by b reason of a IL deficiency judgment for Cor entered In III the tha Third dis iet court In Iii favor of ot A II against plaintiff Plaintiff claimed that at nt the time the tho deficiency judg juda judgment ment wits was rendered against him the th property was WAt exempt by reason cease of It Il Hoi being heing UK his hla homestead tried time the ease rase rn decided that tho lie title to th tin wild raid property was In plaintiff subject ct however to the tIme claim of or Mr evidenced by b my the deficiency judgment lie He held helel that list saul raid property was not occupied as a 1 homestead by J Kolsom nt at the tho time the judgment was rendered and hence henc the judgment WAS wasp K p valid arpi existing lien Promo From thIs thin decision Folsom appealed to the ho Supreme court Iy fly reversing the HI judgment of ot time the lower loner In Its de ute today toda the he supreme court hold holdi that hat plaintiff had II a right to claim a exemption In the tho lands I ds hll hf r occupied by himself and family or n nl nit t and nl that the tho selection election of or a 1 homestead under tho tim exemption law lawi Is III nut not 1 to one parcel parrel of ot land but n uy v be several parcels just as ns long Ion UK hI tm lie Hie value of or the tho th same name does not ex cx cecil 1 the sum um fixed by statute as os ex ox clout from rom execution The decision Is t reversed and ond remanded for a lieI trial J |