Show WILT irr GO rO TO COURTS COUnTS Xo Nt Settlement IlIa Likely in hi I Dispute i Bc Bc- l h cn Mining Companies Ernest t II It Woolley of or tho Mines Mimics Development comp company pany ny denies the lie statement of F F. O. O 0 McFall of the Mabel Malie Ma Ma- Ia- Ia loci lie company that the he Mines Develop Develop- Development I ment nent ent company had made math an any overtures 0 looking to the settlement of the disPute dispute dis llis- as 15 to ownership of twenty seven feet between the propertied The only settlement which will be II considered he says is the abs ab dute ownership by hy bythe bythe the tho Mines Mimics Development company compan of tho the strip in dispute He lie says bays Mr r McFall came to our otto oll office ollice ce himself and saId he lie want wanted the matter settled so that hat he could sell ell his stock in the lie under the load Mabel an and amid get gel from He Tie said that hint he appreciated the tho fact that lint tho ho Mines lInes Development company com coin I pany r. my had reputable witnesses wh who could show that hint the Mabel label ml mine or em Glory Mole Hole belonged to the theUne Mines Une Development D company McFall i said ald that that- his sole Intention in coming was 10 1 get set some seine quick mone money out Ut of or the I Some Seine representatives of or the Mabel company compan have hae been Leen aroun around fill for seven tn days back suing suing- for peace hence We e tb do not want an any Q of f the he ground belon belonging to the thc Mabel l but we know that the thel stake stal on our line has been moved rno and anti we can prove It Il There Thore stated In lii the can call bo be no settlement as mn morning ning papers except on that haI baI basis basis' ba ha- sis sis' I I It It 1001 looks hooks s as if the tho question of the tho ho ownership of or the strip In dispute would have hase to be settled In La the tho courts court |