11IVCTII 11 VTItl HradstreetB gIves te following summary sum-mary of uicnso recently decided The New York supremo court first department enjoins the United 10rta Ide hoIstIng lnglnJr Unlun n Inbor oganlzalloa cngag1 III the hullalll ndulry of New York city from Inter fering with one Hcnjamlll P Dante anonunlen man unit alst ordering the union to laP borIs 1100 Inmng for laving kept him from teal hilg from June 1895 to August ISM When the lull wai tried the plaintiff proved that the sc Ircntollv ot the union loch calld ou vaeluuc rllld here he ob tolnc l employment aol ohtolnd hIs discharge by threatening a strllo on lbs bulldlnKS they were erecting unless they discharged DavIs The court Bald thai should such proceedings be tolerated toler-ated working men though competent and willIng weald be snails tu earn a lIvIng Xo doubt a healthful result Mould follow fol-low If moro cases of this kind were token Into court for the decisions would of necessity bo In line with this one Tile tjranny of labor unions H I sometimes os Inurternbl ns Ia I thnt ot vnrlclou emlloor n1 the loreSr vatlon of personal llberly Is I oj necessary neces-sary to say the least as the main lenance of high wages