Show Grading proposal rates an ‘F’ Orue a stand as proposed lsu-rrcctw- mi'-tak- t' a d tmiuhv the l Mgn of it set- - the rorrwtion should improenunt Thf latest hill eademic Standards Committee demonstrated lUst the opposite The hill rei ommends that grades changed h retaking a course he averaged in with the original grade lowering the value ot tin1 second earned grade Besides lowering the mdividual grade the overall grade point average will the new grade replaces the original therefore est grade The present s stem also permits students to retake courses for better gravies whereas the proposed system would discourage attempts to improve whose and other students ed if w affect be adv ould curriculum require high grades ersely the change were implemented repeating a course w ould he of limited v alue The bill also suggests that the "N" grade be eliminated and replaced by a failing grade The "N" grade on a report card is given to a student who never attends the class and fails to officially drop the class The grade does not mean the student failed the course The bill should be defeated while the present grading system be continued The recommendations lack merit and are unfair to students who attempt to improve their grades On a grading scale the proposal should be rated a failure Presentlv negating the IVe-la- low pre-medic- O06WM i COST Cs r 1 Congratulations team To the editor In their most recent victory CONGRATULATIONS to our basketball team for their con- centrated efforts against the Utes and I other members of the executive council would like to note the enthusiasm displayed by the crowd as the Aggie team defeated the University Gf Utah Utes 80 to 72 in the Spectrum Wednesday It would be a boot for the morale and a defeat for apathy if the crowd in attendance would our support to a greater extent team as they defeat the BY U kitty cats Saturday Let s show those kitty cats like we showed those fake Ute Injuns intends to take no that our team kitty poop'!'!! Annond Accuttoroop ASL'SU Executive Vice President Beliefs rights confused To the editor In response to Mr Hergh s I H have to admit that I was very impressed by his vocabulary and completely dazzled by such a mature attitude concerning the pranksters at the UC theater Mr Hergh introduces a question of rights and he is partially correct The prank was uncalled for and he and his fiance should not have been forced to view the pornography As for keeping smut out of Cache Valley for everyone however he is letter r of ot infringing on the rightsthe rig Just as we should have ers be protected from smut ot i it should have the right to view co has they please Mr Hergh con fused his personal beliefs indiwdua with cerning morality rights lv 1 am sorry something ason oU tragic as this could happen To aVO’ beautiful campus ne further such incidents I suggest transfer to BYU D Long |