Show I NEW PHASE DEVELOPS I IN THE BRADLEY D Y CASE Nov 26 B The Bradley II case rase his has 1 a R new n aspect aspert ppl The i code co of nt the District of or Co Columbia c Columbia lumbia provides provide pro that ner persona acquitted lI nf wr charges on the sole ole ground gJ und or i 1 tit ut the time the th offen orren offense wn shall 11 he hr h tried for to 10 In Insanity Insanity sanity by b a l Inquest of 01 rI the Ih Inquiry to tie he conducted In the Ute presence peen nie and nd under the II direction dire lion of or the theor court or Those with the rec record If Iford ord of nf district courts my wy no per person r son nn acquitted through II a plea pla of C In Infinity finity dice tile t present rode code became l effective elte UI In IN 1502 ha h has ever been Imme Imm Immediately reloaded 1 from New should houlet Mn Met M Bradley be acquitted an as lIt sentiment she Ahe trill be she h will still till be K far tar rem from lib liberty erty rt the hp I verdict be bf not nol guilty nn on the th account of 01 insanity On the theother theother other tend It i is contended that rc ro recard card of 01 the th code cod ode the th Jury JUI nifty may mo as uc aswin 11 win use Judge of th the evidence simply ply re ra return turn tm a verdict of ot not guilty without petting forth any reason for such n a 1 verdict In the th tb latter event the th court lirt would be allowed no nn discretion In the them matter m of ot a lunacy lue trial tal even w were rn rA such thing contemplated and Mat th the de tie defendant fondant would be bf immediately released CONCLUDED The reading of or the hypothetical question w was WAa concluded at 2 debark Dr Ur Barton declared that after atler hear beer hearing ing in It U he be concluded that Mrs Idra Brad Bradley Bradley Bradley ley wa wee aa Insane Inn at t the time she ahe com committed commUted committed mUted the act Her lieI particular all ail ailment ment meat he said leI was waa Insanity |