OCR Text |
Show The Iolyt;nmy ii IscukhIoii After much corrc-pondciicc, which reminds us considerably of some of the epistolaiy interchanges between gentlemen who want to neipiiie the reputation of duelists without undergoing under-going the ri.-ks of au actual encounter, Dr. J. V. Nevman, who came from Washington forthe purpose, and I5iig-ham I5iig-ham Young have final y agreed upon the preliminaries of a if bite on the question, "Does the B bin sanction I'o'yiramy?" Orson PrutU represents Iiriuhain, taking the iillii niative side, though us )r. Newman's challenge was In B igham personally, we do not see why he selects a proxy to speak for him. The question is niiuple enough, and ought to be settled by the simple citation of a text. Di. Newman, in Washington, assumed to prove that the I'ib'e condemn po'yga-my, po'yga-my, and Mr. Young Nought to have him ml pt that, position in the discuv siiin at. Salt Pake, but I r. dee ined, throwing the oini.t prubumU ?n the advocates ad-vocates of iiolyeainy. Thu debate will bo rccardeil with very general intercut. S'. Cull, Aityu' Iti. Certainly, Dr. Newman assumed to prove lhat the 1! ble condemned polygamy; poly-gamy; but he backed down on that, look the pound that, the Bible did not sanction polygamy, ami made a sad failure in the at tempt to su tain his liei-llt vo. |