Show LEGAl CHNICAL1TII Legal technicalities responsible in a great mciisuro for tho flagrant mlecairi ages justice in tho past twenty years and it is slovvl but surely dawning upon the minds 61 those charged with framing fram-ing the laws that nothing hut first class acknowledged ability and talent should i be used in tillering or amending the slat uto books It Is but u fow months since a wholesale delivery of convicts from Iho I Colorado Mate Penitentiary took place because of technical flaw In hoe m inner in-ner of trial the amended law ro quiring the prisoners to ho indicted by u grand jury S before trial In tho cases delivered from tho prison some nintyflvo tho prisoners had been tried on Information and duh lonvicted bv II jolly legally sworn and in all rfsjKds tho trials wont according to law hulas tloe men had not been subjected l to tho f IKO of sa hear bug Ioefow l1It1 indictment In aiand jsry the wcio icleased from confinement to to before II cr md jur for indictment for crimes of Inch hey had ulrcah bien proven guilt Vn > reason iblo man will admit th il Ibis was all It Inoe1cr 1 of jut tin 5 and vet it took placo in neighbor bog Stab under < th I e ruling of u I SI ilu J ssdge 11 i is IIIHI most uf los men so released were indicted 10 tried reconvicted I re-convicted and scnlimcd whlloa few of them ff = ui > ul lonvktion owing lo the absence of mikiial wltnibses foi tint j ro > eetiton llivmenwho had nciud I two till co or live vcais is thou ciw lni booed were hciitcncI to a full torsos t I hoin thedlto of thu Itht l n nti nn ui I inui il tjiievous so s dIg va puipctritcd In tilts guise of hw which cm only hu nghtdb tots unoof exeeiithuclcmenc Something wool similai is now tlucat cncd in New York State cording too iMHfHenil in hoe cats of Uderm Taehne boiler knonn as the Boodle Aldcrmannho was convicled of briber In taking moncv for his vote on the Hroadna Surface Hnilroid franchise and pontenced ten ears III SIng Sillg It Is elalmcil In this Instance that the Court of Appeals will decide lhat the in dictmcnl should hav been under the Consohtlulf 10m tel Act and not under I thc Cole If tins decifclon is i given Jacbno w ill go free md flu chanceof con Vieltng and punishing pevcril others who were In the deal will be lost No man doubts the Riilll of Iiiehno IIn1 I Ins con federalcs yet 01111 technical error bv the prosecuting itloinev who framed tIle imhctmcnl ho i is likely to i eapo Iho I righteous piimsbm of his cimie With IhcFoficts before them tho mm who next II1l1lellnko use revision of the stat 1 ute or the fornntion of liws which arc in conllict with hu existing law should ho men the keen st perception ill legal loie and 1 its infinite Celt ° tItlctiOlis IIn1 it should not lo I left 1 t to incomi > eleiit nun through politic 01 other leMOnS who will bulehci it onh to entail endless trouble on our court mil bring disgrace on our Ip tribunals |