Show THE ORIGIN gi TRIAL JURY it is ii a scry cry gr jerou eat inis mistake tako to suppose suppo C that hat the jury sy tm was either cither established by one man or that it lisitz lin je decondi cendt d I to in from anglo son biln annc it 13 15 tell true that ninety nino nine ton out of every hwi bundled diel bel belinc ec that king allied tile the anglo saxon n nion girt an 11 dj kel ke l find and tile the tf of trill ariit by jury and rine nine out of often or olour our histories gravely st altire iti IK that such mich mas islas iho fa h t alicie cannot ati bibly be it 1 l bit halir amai al blun ler dor for kin king mired alfred had no more tu to do with willi trial by jury than voth the exiting existing of thoi hit county court the orron oua roin opinion is ih not confined on lined to tile the tin n lied abed or to trio tle partially Iorli illy instructed lut but li most ela da a a proof ol of which 0 etc o inny observe thai that t tile cartoons sent tit in years ss ao 0 o f the ia u of tile now new of it V 1 liam onu ono represents presents rp a trial in ill tit ipen nir air with a judge and mr adjudicating upon unon rt it culprit trial liy IT wa not ft a sudden suil ln invention nor art an in tuition iDi twi ution tion abruptly it grew iii 1 by bv ol grees troi small beginning ginning bo and li gilr oi its iti fitin f itin irom from the ilia nio biml anacon condi of other there was wai owning enen en rc resembling cin bling it in the ami or on of ot justice tit tin anglo saxons pro IMS tu to the tha norman ylia tit i e ihrl they bield ire are well known to tv tf r v reader of if history hii tory thore was the or curts of the bundred thu tho in it goi guinote note or court of tle lite county and th A or of the ling hing 1 L and in ili ail binl con conti ti i i tile ilia hi ilot court of nil lilt th te re wai III tile hie or dmn truit lotsis wools wini tt a liin itil and there win wasi the li waldor or lieu dinnin of every ten fain thes hasina the hie to arbitrate 11 g J 1 rt L lii i vo vr e I 1 I 1 ly co it I 1 I 1 s III I 1 I 1 I 1 cli ra accio 91 anil alad no flo J hii its 3 men man tile rein oil ln its it n proba 1 iilo ali it ajl alit n jda of holding hu liling tile gave ri risa I 1 tu to thu the notion that tos 1111 liy by jilly itol I tol anong ini ig our i a 01 I 1 alto in 1 I willya wil lya lur or r cief men ft r fit ed it 11 ii with tile alic dilli hilliald ald county nitwit trill i of if the pre ire ent dil bilue fit biltl nil tl z proceeding in coarson hron to tilo tho 1 w v ofer itne anil and alien hw clivy haj hai collected collect cil at alio evidence ell ca of lilt fuel fact as well us the judge judger r of f thi th law and decided accordingly they erp ei judge jury awl witness witlie S nil fiji combined anil and it requires but a few ino ilow il rn OW to discern tho hid vital between suel a e as thia nim ilia file inic jury Q itam in progress of flints tile th of alio llio twelve ghanei re alv 1 I 1 it if lot antu ills A number of re fie fi la e elble lse peron per rons on utu usually ally but not 91 it in bumler bete v cre selected from tit fr where wl cre st a crime or u r th lanuto li colace not bott tor orthe the purpose e 0 of f delivering any vei I 1 sel dirt but that they inight opinions pi I 1 I 1 it t bring being supposed that they ailon something 1 I of the matter thus vio ito und that these persons were acro sworn to teal acal tile inith liy by ft further er mauling ani an I cf the sy dykell kell these indi iguls wore tro limited limit td ted to twelve anil and gradually assumed tile function and 1 it mey bo bit rarely avers icI that it M in lie 1110 fit linic of henry VI that the apte ent of t rial by jury vias MS consolidated coni then via usi it alint hey were sworn not to prak tile the truth RS as in ills tile preceding furi I 1 nUli uli but to decide Ac ic cordin cording to tile hie eVl dolice ll 11 tim thus from having atea inere the inan grew into int juryman jurymen JUry men sea ing tho ell idencio ot or instead jie |