Show kaik AND AM CONSUMER 11 tin the tux volley Luil gile recel itly nil lilt of special clinell store taxes tal it lei rit tes lalli vividly the differences in III the lii ine thoIs of tile varlo its diff differences erenceN taint lit anany haw bred glaring injustices itoi now luno grillet wed store maxem tito iowa and rules are tile lightest for chillus with lowi less than it il hi hundred milrea stores inid and texas rutes ihu file liu fien tf avias mit und von have tin the rates jf it progression A chall of five ktores pays 1 l t total lotny sil chil tila of but 20 lit in colvit or dilill illiesco ta I 1 lait lilt it puy in floddin and 00 in montana A of 20 stores 0 lainys vs 10 ID lit in lown ion it mid minnesota alid lit in idaho tim the tor oil ratu rate a iii fil where per store midst lie ile bald in class bilges for out corli h over 00 50 the ilio I of excessive taxation of bretall uli tleta tire tit lit luat last becoat a evident vi dent A major chain was cantly can hy forced to close a large laiko nuni hor ber of stores lu lit llean sylvanin where it 11 of stores must pay it special tux tax of this ingalls that ini loyLa avre thrown out of work property vacated and competition les lesselles selled at tho the ex penso of the general public the average chain storo store system it 11 nut net profit of but ono one or two edth for each dollar of bug bua aliw transacted jHo uio used usia axed have cost tile tho linins more their entire not tarn barnings ings lit in years faced with it 11 ory financial hurden such stich na as this the chain can call to do but one olle of two balse itt its prices nil along the line or close its tt storo store the ur or coti bears ahe direct burden of excessive chain atoru taxation cost of living ja lit in aud persons with fixed lit in comes liny iss which reduces nn na dional purchasing power A do pres rn aslon slon effect Is exerted over the othro nation |