JUS A 0 M INDER ance ince activities ceru r renewed recently t to arouse it interest rest 1 in t the building ofa of a raa icik road 0 avei over bu iki th la to 16 beaver bearer comment c en t has ha been heard I 1 b bothi th fo tor r and kima 1 t i t this same same edinia u up in and at that time a canvas canas was made odthe of the commercial club the county and mhd taxpayers i of garfield county and etwas it was found that th the e tiie the people 0 of o garield county were in favorat favo rot a road from to paragonah Para gonah via creek peak as against the proposed proves e d Duck buckskin skin road as a commercial rou route ono one of 0 the strong arguments belne that the ibe little creek peak route mostly serve would be built with Y federal ede ral aid arney money chich would amean that chat widen wb en built aie we a i splendid e standard a all 11 year aroun around d highway another being that li would afford the I 1 people othla county count ya a shorter an and d quicker auker and when everything nf Is taken into consideration a cheaper route to the railroad i it seems seem upon investigation that tue the sentiment Is ii just as strong today in favor ot of the little creek peak road as it w was as at that time in fact trie situation remains practically unchanged As this Js Is a queston cheh concerns thel the entire county of Gartl eld we are reprinting an art article I 1 cle on the subject written baw W houston appointed a member oi of a road committee at a meeting of the commercial club at that time and which was published in heneks the he ne News a of my may ae 25 1928 1 also alio an a article ida written t by the late editor in june 6 5 1928 which we belleve believe explains the situation thoroughly f