Show THE OBJECT the object of the application for A writ of fia habeas ba sw in the me of apostle lorenzo snow waa to test the legality of the segregation business before tee united states supreme court the action of the third district court in the matter looks very much as if judge zane had a wholesome terror of the supreme tribunal of the land reviewing his honors action the deseret news says asa As a matter of course the application for a e writ corpus in the case of lorenzo snow was refused by judge zane the object of the denial ofa of a plain legal right is ls perfectly clear the law provides that in such stich cases appeals p eals can bo taken direct from the I 1 district i s brict court to the supreme court of the united states if the writ had been granted there would hare been no obstacle in iii thomay of th d appeal those who the ile anti mormon crusade in the courts appear to be afraid to have their extra judi cial acts reviewed by the superior tribunal otherwise there would have been no reluctance to issue the writ it Is an incontrovertible pro proposition that no upright judicial officer would be willing to perpetrate the outrage of imprisoning n 9 p people eo 0 illegally ille Illi eally gally in iii this matter the c chief 01 f an anxiety biety appears to be to do that very thing and to place every possible ob stace ta clin in the way of having those acts properly adjudicated by superior review the refusal could not properly bo be based upon the pretense that tha t the court in the event of granting the w writ t would uld have haie no a alternative terna tife other aban than t to Q send send the petitioner back to p prison rison ho euch excuse could con don distantly instantly antly be offered in view of the fact that the object of asking for the procesa process was the testing of an undetermined ter tor mined legal point the question of segregating or dividing up the offense ef of unlawful cohabit ion the court chuld nave have issued the writ and sent the prisoner back and th thus us given an in 0 opportunity p ort unity for its acts if they were me illegal lal to be corrected and I 1 if right to be sustained the denial was an outrage and amounts so far as the action goes to a suspension of the writ of habeas amus allowable only in times of war or great public excitement the people may be assured that such proceedings edinga will not be effectual in preventing efforts being made to secure to them their rights in the promises re D I 1 isee the action so peremptorily py and d tyrannically disposed of in in the third district court is not the terminus of the matter |