Show A Mi STERLI on oil ilia of first WIN cool test Igil nii it IS well anno knonk elot bilut first IV nives ives linc laic beci anade to testify yogi lust their husbands its lit in utah nna anil that the infamous r bill ROW ir before coll 91 girst asli to le illige such ily n lite lion if ali inada an all able ar argument guillent the alic Judi clai v coul of lie it 0 house men buies for or utah and ami irom front ill ills speech we tile 1 ill I 1 viall il call conr attention to alic larit section 6 0 his bill provides that alic alo Is a competent witness iu in this now elie wl wife fc lii in anius cases lil Is admitted to testify ties glicr hus husbard baud such as in ii acts ol of violence or autra outrage c upon her I 1 lichts rot roi Ance it lie husband brings an red b all tely upon her I 1 sti poe slie rise la Is pel to testily testify tied nul ought to testify nov then iben does not thit question turn uon this point it if call concede that a croud iii irlie c Is an all cutill outlast 0 on the u aljo wile ia in adultery which Is mi ili outrage on the lie legal wife lii 1 there any luttin luli insle sic let alone tile sa fa cleans of 0 llis tie tic women do not lime many daily rights under tinder the com nion liw law huy wy way led Is 1 abere any in to lo babu the put on tile stand to tile hustind alio la guilty often of an OI 01 outrage itan c of the bu lle iu it 11 there is 14 no ne of tiny any light fight it li Is of conceded float it would infringe hie a principle lct lad 3 on uphold it you yon permitted her to cesti testify fy but it seems to you concede it if 3 on olt tic do concede that it a second marriage it if a I 1 frilan tl lAllon ion of a sacred right of hers that yon von do not any sound lit lien you put tier her on oil tie aliu stand tind compel tier to suend up not only lu lit her own ini but lei in the ilia view of the be it public interest it 1 it II Is f nil all oil bouc rio rage against good cod morals as nell M ll na as agal agalise ag alist tbt the lie iou on not compel her to lo testify testily not so eo enuch to lo tier onu 1 as lei in the ease casu of an let act done in ilu ululation lation nl the public ri lot noy ov habdo y yon oil say to that mr air chandler Clia I 1 haec simply to siy say I 1 in klinl in 1111 first lilau late tile uhle quei isi ilmo nui ns as I 1 appreciate it rests apoll 6 that such lit 1111 net alec vt of UK tile lins hus hand is ij a pei bonal to or of at viola timit of lie I 1 i aghta of 0 the ilac u ife mr Ste wali it Is that denied by bani anybody except ilia mr chandler well I 1 tie do not diio li know io I 1 lincic lille linc not nc consulted miny of n them on oil tilt llie object still and really ronld could oot dot siy say abit hae think about it the I 1 think ilio ilia cases it in halh lie Is lot in to do ac ii for her liu roii 0 it pi tion shi satt inay a ear the pence against her ber and ur mr girou they we to do it ir and lit in etab elitie is a ian it bakh per it in cases ot of assaults when they lire are inc ut upon lie stand ald aid compelled to testily testify mr Z stewart then is it not dot 61 simply I a oaid lion of sound public pulley policy i if under tinder till all oil I 1 oil ii compel R anoman 1 dole to testify in iii omer oilier 1 I olds oil Is it fleches leilly tilly any ally oil vilric ric aze upon poll adt jet Is lt it scicli nu ali of of it 11 tie de pir luie boom fiodi the niell settled rules it ou it compelled it woman to testify I 1 nut sparking tin ing about it now as aa a sol t 0 of because ut of coterie coi iric that Is I 1 the al unbent upon which tills ills provision worst must rest it it icsis at all it nt be upon elio theory that lei in tue the first ilie alio personal light of 1 tile lint st wife or till the w wie i a hs has boon been outraged by the ibo second lilii rinse and second div ulion aoi tile pi elial the institution to be ba mp pressed lires il poasi blu research should be anade in t all means of evidence lei in order to secure convictions is it 13 1 lo 10 make this lii proof so it becomes bec onles simply 1 attics floor alc tlc n of if public policy under all dickum Rs as to bit bat ii best to bo be done mr ale chandler I 1 that there is s too no impediment in the way vay ut of the wito testify against tile the end 1 is relay ile be that the evil Is sunlit to bo be cot coi routed IS ii sum I 1 bently grive to delai 9 front the of eidl al nary ot of anve lie in older code r to esposa and to tile the ottense offense that bonit niu t be the ilia assumption now their v would it be b proper in order to lo punish a nicio for us its muth as 11 h ab nb hot I 1 ell by diat tit who tie er it id any thin to do it to compel il at party blin ell to I 1 arnish urnis li evidence to establish that we all ny no wu we ull lill say ahat it 3 yon to li make the hie party parly ed furnish tin tile tu to pinic piove him guilty of te be clinic it bould nit ba light eight mr wo all agrio to that mr he Cloi udler now you hive have traced blue bin to 1 fi I ic lilion lah alth a person alio ito does not estee esteem n I 1 ibis conduct coin luct of u his as tilt an leibe inbe i 1 1 1 1 1 ijar 1 19 abe fotij like ilie fichti ich ti it mill III i 0 I 1 bilm 1 volunta 1 As ili illy mr air bidwa L bike la is the ilie first wife mr ir chandler uli indoor yes site elie Is the first ditc itc and bec becomes onles so louder 1 I 1 thiet contemplates others and iino nixes to it il now no personal involve liis liag been ibe litney lit nry exiel llou lieu lei in the law heretofore of lier her tool y NOW toy I 1 is tile lle aitu it not ot beer to lally when ilie ilia assault Is will tell nee is by iid IB of imballi and v lle ile Is tic co sack elcied ed that where she li IS beaten field and file he is not cJ to to it mr ir I 1 think that tests upon tile lie continue uw law principle that lie ho ficia pcr of the p or 11 ties lies are arc swallowed up tip in the wars sir chandler that lb ilia elie theory of 0 elie common I 1 diw tw that chat there hero was a unior in ili a unit to iu between lite husband hubband ami lc unil and 80 60 sacked finca was that ulilla front invasion loo arid ila dif cot void it that like diw JAW up tip to a cc later would not that fly by thil tang cl t tier pasty pally to COME into it 11 til lonual against another and curitti er ir now tile the exception to that I 1 tile hasiu vas it tile case the llo alo ito vis vas beaten anil and betki cl the might be culled lei iu to testify chete MS as sible the iho limitation in ile ibe first instance was where there its as no other oilier that IA I 1 excel lorial suppose a num mill commett why not lot kiako iho to wile wife in 11 and toll ill hl fonfe uon lulun iolob in ili her that I 1 ie lus has the he murders murder 1 iq 1 here tiny bubli c lethion tie r publio public policy abat shelter a nian nun from the test ot lit the alit in u it 11 ca cae e if if and nut lot iu 10 so 1 l c ciso of abigil mr I 1 thin I 1 ciu can state the leabold lCt lea thUll boll clr I 1 should be flail to lipar liar it mr Ste your statement 0 of tile mp m P shows this oil ginal idea is if founded on nil elio lio notion of unity now I 1 lien you adall tile iho plurality it li if different clr Ch chamdler audler yes yea but tile the tru tee cannot argue ironi front two the cannot argue arum the stand point of one noo n wife ila rind nud their bit ink tk anay aly front roni it lend argue ilie ilia caso case from the ot of plural iivari mari lages I 1 an ani hallfin lall fin to the point of 0 this unity be bc mile and ai fo nit mr stewart unity on the one aljo suit ud plurality on the ollic we lye are deallo de allt with will plurality mr chandler you are deallo iab with the of ti lil limy gauly lt jt Is i DO worse in otte one state than another it a mim man arries ro U two io whereof it IS 1 jhc thc same MUK co 10 r elnie doue done in the ibe if t columbia 3 on oil never ILou alil it alie lie to cabelli tills ihla rule it II 14 A crime litre here ni na lei in utah ulah now when I 1 al you oil to say vs bather yuu oil legard it as a a wage policy to make the wite a witt leal aydlott tue the hubli tod I 1 in al order to tile the biK buti bind band 1 ulu I fth murder I 1 hotl u spilt au all awer that question or else I 1 insist answer the question negatively lei in I igaina cases because we must look it at tit an offense oki nse in the grade that the law gives it the law has always classed minder as more debased and depraved than polygamy or unlawful ananiase ina niase N knofl 0 why ia step down don to ol of lad and pick ick out it a clime aud and make inake lie hie wife a witness fitness in abit dubor dina teci will dot RO go t to tile he full leng th her testimony to the lil higher tiar out cue why does doca the human billu I not stI LIGI away from otte one rind and not shrink away from rom the other I 1 J he wore moro hideous and in ghastly the crime the greater lite excuse elcine end and lor for her eligible witness vit ness now tills proposed liw law does not noc do any such tiling ns na that this hill bill itself with one ilia particular violation of 0 liw law and to 10 that case milca glicr it a and refuses to make heva glicr a witness in the iho other cases cages nirl and I 1 say tt lien you do that you on express a lii tnt ot of the very vary doci 1 inc illich you propose i to sta establish blish in the particular case you lime got t to miko make m iko lt it universal uni vergal in regard to crim crimes cs committed by ber husband or else you express when you macelt nihiko it exceptional your dial rust ol of tile die in those caeto to which you do not apply it I 1 believe polygamy Is punished in utah I 1 its as lei in vermont arid and it if you horold not lorl arios ag the A M ife in into to court in vermont fermor lin n an attitude of to tier her hu I 1 cannot see ehy you should do it II in nod i yon would not foot bling tile the wife ife into court us as a NIt witness ness lei in 1 a I cac cabe ol of murder where human life is taken away IN will ill you depart from the ordinal ordinary y metti ois arid and usages to introduce tier her 1 in e it a case cac of bi garny ilia injury to glicr rights here sa Is purely ind and just as this we ve speak of it Is constructive Therel is stio no pliS physical iono dono tier nor 13 tier marriage tile affected ftfe ceeil tied and to ro far ar al e she ebo citi can assent to loiis the she does docs to 0 that ihu the hie reison lei in tills this case for tile the wile a witness ii against alliba the humbo hustind because of fonia ppe dial injury fallin upon 11 post the wife lie only exiana const it 11 does not exist lei in ica lity it exists eil because we a fancy incy it site 1111 to tier her while otte die dues does not fancy it na n injury to tier her send we ble agine ile 1 and it the ibe a I 1 lei to iii r slit 1 I 14 1 lit in ate an injury 14 hulmn jiin lir lier li r antl mil not be cabie son um bulone iu lone li it is fallen on oil her per frill liot bec aliw arly any legal leg al liivik in n if lie glicr 1 1 hm lihn pl 0 it 14 1 only I 1 den 1 not dowiny I 1 k A V I 1 1 A f it bi be I 1 not A a boulad to inal alc wife mile in he nit all clin linal c the tic it iq not win to milti make it nil an dx in ilk fisc ease |