Show MUMMERS WIN NOTED CASE count in utah ma ue u e public funi in prosecuting ot ficiala charged etith failing to t 0 perform their duta dut this is the th substance of the decision down don monday by the supreme court of utah in r nv the court of calbon coun and renn for i t now new anal ti ial th case care ca re of carbon county rf re UK av tint nn t i lilliain T himilton benton randolph Kandi lph joseph it R sharp county counts aind tile amt aim suret company D V Mik alik lejohn neil nell il maden and T el 11 Tt Tilo ionus mag bondsmen t count is a bioust the suit blitte tilt db rond ants to recover money alleged kad tu hive been without Nit hout legal authority in in the defend ints sod thit th it in 1012 1912 1913 and ind 1114 1914 C V w wis ts counte count altot tit toine lie ti in I 1 chomi v F kellet ts lount shariff riff the delenda 08 alleged ille sed these officers lud had filled to bling ind and gamblers gambl erh which they said were eltive alth puh III the missi ont I 1 had these two oti nials to take union the tile u complis is st itta thit th it tho 3 had bad appealed fd to the st ite attorney attorn ei for aid id mahout avill will in the premises the tho lount coin coni then due ettI une one atoil 1 hill to institute in his name both m dunst abst thu the lount at and thi alvi iff the count intorn 3 nas aa of ne sita sit so tile era coun count t tl I 1 and paid the it tt tornes aiom the courtl fund cubon county filed i aeneid it do de tu t tile and the tile dis anet louit sustained the ind nicked judgment the defendants aljo hei Lupori ap petted to t the tile bU court |