OCR Text |
Show GROWING SOVIET THREAT WHY RESTORE THE CONSTITUTION Continued from page 10 By Thomas O. Breitling ICBM's. Nearly two years in office did not change his mind. That was shown at the Sept. 29 meeting, when Carter again questioned the need for the ICBM. The Dec. 1 response, personally written by Brown, discussed, after its warning of disaster, missile is needed. Brown insisted why a land-bason retaliatory capability come what may, in the face of new and unexpected Soviet developments. He further stressed the need to maintain some MEANT FOR ALL The Constitution . is worth saving because it declares in a written social contract that all who choose to live under it may exercise the humanity which God has given us. And the persons who need it are everyone. Harry Atwood in his 1927 book. The Constitution Explained, gives a brief analysis of the plan of as making the Constitution . 200-25- 0 ed after an initial (nuclear) capability perhaps for days, or weeks, or even a few months. This notion of a nuclear war that would not be exchange completed in one apocalyptic spasm has been advocates rampant in the rejected by arms-contradministration. It also has been publicly rejected by Harold Brown, who returned to this position in the Dec. 1 memo: I should note that I doubt that a strategic war of this kind is at all likely, or that it could be fought without rapid escalation to an unlimited spasm. Then, however, Brown tells his president what arms controllers will not admit: But there are many indications that the Soviets are structuring the forces to fight such a war. Their plans and exercises point the same way. If they think they have such a capability, and we both know that the United States does not, adverse military consequences are possible, and adverse political consequences very likely. While Browns memo has been safeguarded as though it were a secret weapon, there is no mystery about the Air Forces position. Its chief of staff, Gen. Lew Allen, championed a mobile land-basisystem in a Dec. 29 letter to the House Armed Services Committee, which was cleared by Brown without a word changed. This is a weapons decision where the president cannot claim support from the military or where his apologists cannot plead lack of outside advice. In this case, Carter needs no warnings about unilateral concessions under Soviet pressure from Scoop Jackson, Paul Nitze or Mel Laird. What they would say is duplicated by his trusted secretary of defense; who seems to be going unheeded. (End of Quote) ol ng Extra copies of this issue 509, 5 for $1 , 50 for $5 100 for $10. THE HERALD OF FREEDOM AND METROPOLITAN REVIEW (ISSN 0018-048is published by The Herald of Freedom ISA School House Rd., Somerset, N J. 08873 Subscriptions $12 per year, $7 for 6 months Frank A. Capell, Ed. & Publisher, Tel: (201) 469-20Second Class Postage Paid at Somerset, N.J. 08873 ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O. Box 3000. Manvilie, N.J. 08835 POSTMASTER: Send address changes to The Herald of Freedom and Metropolitan Review, P.O. Box 3000, Manvilie, N.J. 08835 3) kly 88 TOM should there be an organization in Utah or anywhere which has as its primary purpose to restore the Constitution"? Because, as Lt. Col. Archibald Roberts has stated in 77ie Crisis of Federal Regionalism: A Solution, There is a criminal element in Washington and New York,..., Which seeks to overturn the Constitution, seize control of private property, and reduce Americans to the status of economic serfs on the land which , once was theirs." dedicated and for which it Article I. 2. Plan for setting up a bi- - Legislative Department and vesting it with QUESTION The statement above partially answers the question. But, the be amitself needs to question plified. Someone who hates, fears, or despises the Constitution might ask, Why is the. Constitution worth saving? Who needs it? This article gives reasons why I consider it worth saving and eminently worth restor ing. functioning uphold Constitution 3. 4. powers Article II. Plan for setting up an 5 Department and vesting it with powers and restraints. WHERE TODAY? Where, would any of us be today, if instead of a nation of freemen, this country had been established as a tyranny, a 'totalitarian dictatorship? Would the millions of our ancestors have left family, property, and friends to come to this land, which in the 1800s was a wilderness, if it were not a nation where anyone had the opportunity to break out of the bonds of the Old World? The answer is No one leaves less repression to go to more. ' Clarence Manion, former Dean of Notre Dame Law School, wrote a book years ago about the Constitution of the United States, in which he called it The Key To Peace. You can buy a copy of it for $2 from The Heritage Foundation, 7N015 York Road, Bensenville, IL Article III. 6. Plan for setting up a United States. 14. Ban on religious test as qualification to public ANTI-REGIONALIS- M IN ARTICLE IV Regionalism is the Fabian Socialist idea of unitary (that is, centralized) government which groups States and Counties into federally controlled agglomerated units. Article IV, Section 3 of the Constitution forbids this. It provides that: New States may be admitted by the Congress, into this Union, but no new State shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other State, nor any State be formed by the junction of two .or more States, or parts of States, without the consent of the the name Regions" does not forgive this unconstitutional tion.' REGIONALISM DESTROYS STATES Regionalism destroys States, Provision for the amending Constitution whenever . necessary, Cities as and Restore the Constitution throughout the United States are provision that no State, committed to resist coercion and to without its consent, counter-attacnot just to defend. can ever be deprived of Salt Lake County Chapter k; - equalrepresentation in counterattacks on April the United States Senate. Over $3 Million Inventory 825-996- 374-822- Or Write 1657 S. 1250 W., Syracuse, UT 84041 t t i 18 with an organizational meeting at East Mi lie reek Library at 7 p.m. All interested in attending are invited. Carter President appointed, along with other radicals in his 40 member National . Buy close to the source For more information call 3 Graham Smith (801) Ogden, UT Area 8 Brian Pead (801) Provo, UT Area I and Counties, autonomous divisions of American government. In a letter to me Utah functioning powers Senate Majority Leader Fred W. Finlinson stated: and restraints. The issues you raised on 7. Definition of treason. Article IV. Regionalism in your letter are 8. Relation of the States legitimate issues concerning our state and having gone through the to each other. 9. Relation of the Federal primacy battle this year in the Government to States legislature, I am very aware of the actions being forced by the federal and Territories. Article V. government. (Emphasis added.) 10. RESTORATION Members of Committee to R . for ratification. Department and vesting it with t. A Method 15. Judicial Laboratory Certified Pricing near wholesale : the of the and restraints. legislatures of the States Restraints upon the concerned, as well as of the national government. Congress." The regionalist subterfuge of Restraints upon the States. ., calling the agglomerated States by functioning self-eviden- was established by which the people entered into an agreement to set up and maintain the form ANSWERS PARTIALLY the Constitution was cameral 262874 . r J 4 which INFLATION Phone Supremacy of Federal Constitution, national laws, and treaties. 13. Pledge of all national and State officers to are the best hedge against CORPORATION (B01 ) to VICTORIES -WE ALWAYS LOSE DIAMONDS WE BUY AND SELL Salt Lake City, Utah 84115 12. statement setting forth the six purposes Why PRE-WA- Bars ti Medals East 3900 South debts. A 1. COINS 211 11. Provision for national office. Article VII. "Preamble. BREITLING Sliver and Gold corn Article VI. follows: 60106. Lift your glad voices in triumph on high. For Jesus hath risen, and man cannot die. Henry Ware , Jr. MONARCH rage April 19, 1979 The Utah inoepenaem The Paper That Dares To Take A Stand Advisory Committee for Women, Jean OLeary, coexecutive director of the National Gay Task Force. The National Gay Task' Force was able to obtain to provide your five staff members for the National Gay Task Force office in New York City. , tax-dolla- rs I . |