Show important temperanc temperance que altion WA GT O oct 24 ti tho 1 V U S b supreme court today to day denied a motion to advance made by mr packard ardin in four prohibition liquor ease eases from iowa and one from georgia they feroel the same questions which were presented in the kansas cae e of siebold and Il agelin already a argued the attorney general of kani eds 6 9 who by of 0 eion sion dil did not aphea to arguo argue the tile latter aas case orally vi as in tho the court today to day and filed a it petition for or leave to make an argument now the question pre dented by this case is a very important one one a it involves involve 3 the constitutionality ty of I 1 all prohibition legislation since the tile adoption nd option of the fourteenth amendment aich doea acx not provide for the compensation to bre brew era ers and distillers for the value of property destroyed lles ants by the forcible closing of their estate |