OCR Text |
Show EGGLES CAGE 15 QUIGKiJSETTLED Ai.iif:iiTiit'i.iMiHii:Nni.(.K I'OU Sl.io.oon, l.cgnl Settlement rrlvcel t .,!,,. brntcel ConlcM o.r w.,,1,1, ()f M,. ll-Mlllloimlrc Mother l Vutl-fle-el Wlille V nllft Smiid M Cein-HniUM Cein-HniUM An (lie IJ,,,1, fJtiitiillnti. The Ueddcs-Kccle .state aw. , nettled Tuesdn) afternoon when Judge (leorge a. Armstrong signed the order nuthorUIng Thnmn W Hlonn giiHr-dlnn giiHr-dlnn of Albert (Irddra Kcrln. to Hcre.t a. hundred and flftj th.m-Htxl dullnm In Cdh In lieu of an uni'Uldnl nne-thlrt) nne-thlrt) -third Interest In the wtHte of the late !ald Knlen lumber nnd migar king of Ogilen The negotta-tlons negotta-tlons for the nettlement of the enne were concluded eMerda murnlng nnd In the late ftirnoon the petition netting forth the factit on which the nettlement wan Irnned wan preoented to the court Within an hmir and n hnlf the Ueddca-Keclen mne wan cloned In tlio district court or Webor county coun-ty Wednesday there m flleil the Innt pleading In the cane when the stipulation wnn flint, which wt out that Judgment rendered by the Jury In tho famoun cane should Maud and tho matter of a motion for n new trial Is Indefinite!) continued The nettlement an ordered b the court doe not cnrr with It the m-ment m-ment of nn of the nttorne) feen of the prosecution That mattir will lie adjusted by the lourt nt n later date The plaintiff must nlso pa the (ostn Incurred lj the plaintiff In the trial of the cane It wan mated that Albirt (ledde Kvclen will reiele more than n hundred thoumnd dollars clear of nil nttorne) fern, cos Is and expenses The defense of the cane cost the Kcilen estate more than IZ&O.OOO The nttorne) nt-torne) n for the defense ure mid to hae receUed ft 10.000, the admlnls-trntor admlnls-trntor expended more than 160,000 In the defense, nnd It In estimated that detectlven expenseM connected with the gntherlng of evldcuic tt ml othir sums expended In defending the case will ninount to about 10,000 mure This In exclusive of the $160,000 paid Albert Al-bert Gcddcn Kcclen The stipulation filed In the court lit Ogdi II W'ednesda) net out that Thoiims W, Hloan, tho guardian of Albirt (ledden Kcclen, wnUca nil objection ob-jection to the distribution of the Hides Hi-des estate as net up In the petition for distribution, which unn filed before be-fore the trial of the (ledden-Kcclen cane, by David I' Itcclen, administrator administra-tor The stipulation further net out that tho KcoIcn estate desired that the motion for n new trial now pending before the lourt be dismissed and that the verdict of the Jur) nnd tho Judgment Judg-ment of the court be entered iih of record and that Albert (ledden Kcclen be recognised us the acknowledged son of the late David Kcclcn. The case wax tried In Weber county iih n petition for the distribution of the Kicleii estate with the name of Albert (leddcM Kcclcn omitted wan filed with the district court, nnd W. II King objected nnd filed n protest The right of Albert (leilden Kcclcn to be declared an heir wun then tried und the Issue Joined wun whither David Kcclen In Ills lifetime acknowledged him to be his son The Jur) decided that he had. |