THE RULING angan city respondent respond ont va Ill hiram F elnel Eln 1 I nam nl ap penant from not district aud judgment guient of 0 district fault coll 1 riner hedson sain inting anti 0 ordo 1 dc ell icil that alle llant recover uti off the coba logan city respondent ent vs W C buck uit to capes anler logia cliv val va billip oll ie ar ou app eHat judge went ol of ila brict coult reversed sed unit feml aid real that appellant ila ve and re colier costa on oil wednesday lost last the III I 1 arst 5 1 tile action ajas taken liy by the court of catali on oil tile four liquor cases talat were in the first district court during dining ilia affey term fuld appealed froin flat dial court no wa attea opinion in the cases has lia been filed the law requires flat allm to bo be lone done but us as there is ii so no way of the abo supreme court of chah in that matter the honorable judges composing it act their pleasure As ae A rulo rule llroy file opinions but often not for mouth and sometimes not within 1 a I year of tile rendering of jud gement allence antler existing circumstances we nye have to no distinct and anal authentic statement of the ran sona soils and arguments that let led the court to its ila con conclusion clurion ily by an authority however in which we ire disposed to place confidences confidence I 1 we WB havo have been given to understand that thai the court baerd its ruling 0 on tit nl leg ged ambiguity lit in the language of the charter of logan city section 31 1 of the charter rends as follows to license reg ulac ilc prohibit 1 abit or restrain the ho manufacturers tellers sellers or canil ere crt of 61 spirituous or liquors n em kee keeper perc 3 ajam or tippling shop keepers effers ef pers boarding boar diug vict nalin cai or coffee houses saloons Ei loons or other oilier houses or places tor for uin the gelling or of flying giving away ot of wines or othea liquors ln ardent ferous or fermented here given to prohibit the malin manufacturers fact frers and renders lenders spirituous liquors prohibit them from doing loll 1011 elhat selling on ana DO jay day selling after hours sellin selling to minors indians indiana ac what ilia may file city council of logan prohibit liquor tellers from doing the supreme court of tho the territory of utah holde that this section gives the city council power to prohibit a certain clisi class of persons but that it does docs riot not state stale ichak ichi they may no he be aroh from doing and ill that A t therefore it is 1 I bullit nullity y and that power to prohibit the sale saje of liquor has neve r been conferred upon tile city council of logon an if instead of 0 the nouns manufacturers fact aers sellers and ink lenders ell the lie manufacturing t selling I 1 I 1 and ve lad bad acon n substituted in tile section its meaning would have been clear and thue could leave been no question but that power hall had been conferred conferral on the city council to prohibit liquor selling III in in logan so much for the difference between I 1 a noun still anil a verb sull such were wera tho the main points of t the ile opinion of tile the court as understood by a lawyer who was presen present tn v hen it was rendered and as lie gave e them to 10 us ile he did not pretend to repeat the language languid but only the purport ol of the decision this thi means mcana tent the city council of logan have been unsuccessful for the in their persistent and praiseworthy warfare on vice no one however can dispute but bill that they la ila 0 done their part with a unanimity that is marvelous our citizens liaro placed on record in black and white lit tested by their onn olin signatures a prot ct m tile tho legalizing of intemperate a in in their fair city and through their in the city council they have barido strenuous efforts to tile the vice A canse entirely beyond their control has bag afforded the a temper temporary ary ill ad vant vantage all that logan city counell council ca can n now flow do is to pass an ordinance fixin fixing g the rate of liquor al dealers on 1 r 5 license is 3 no dishonor tit in the defeat that it lias As overtaken us and while the event that renders necessary tile lie legalizing aa gal 1 alzi izing ug of the liquor traffic in our beautiful city may well bo be esteemed a public calamity wo ila have ample causo cause to feel proud of the record lie w c have lavo made in if tile the strut struggle aggie for prohibition hibi tion tle tile opening of 0 saloons in ia taij city knitli a ill the results that must inevitably DON stably now flow will not berid it c feel fed sure to the conversion of prohibit 1 zionists lionis ts to tile views of the pro li ij cense advocates in I 1 dicarl I 1 cart spirit and desire lo 10 kogai pu will continue to bo be a prohibition city anti and as soon as ai the lee can call IBO be ind IC calto to correct orr act tile tc clinic tl defects of glicr ter cliart cr we ire 1001 to see lier let become indeed a city cit n baro liquor selling IS ia successfully for forbidden bidlen by law tilt till then let moral means talc take tile the place of iagal restrict restrictions ioUs to p rei ell t the growth of intemperance in ili our mid ini A let parents par cuts guardians and all lia hal ing tile caro care of youth exert clett every legitimate influence to keep I 1 liew dora atay y from temptation anil let lei fill all classes of citizens citi zeus ait as 1 n I t unit in it 1 in it refusing to patronize or in ally manner encourage rl traffic that I 1 though legalized Is ia as degrading debasi debasing jj final pernicious is ever