I AN S B TO ll 1 The hn dona the Ih thing In 11 tho matter or tho encyclical to which Ih tho ob objected lb An I bo I remembered the tha document infer roil to the he I and 11 Iho Ihn In III no noH H Hi veal 11 to 10 the Herman In reply 11 to lu the tl or r the Chancelor thu th nom curl curlu regret over mer the Ih hot th that the Ih cell was 11 not nn to I Imul neither the Iho l ler nor til not ulon o ot Iru but of all RI I not lul ti In make mul the encyclical known In the U dlo 11 e r w a and the Ih of ot Ih This I a I complete withdrawal wul of the tha d ImI tu tuan an tn RI IO ry to t It I that Homo HOI doe not deliberately In Insult II sult ex n If It she hIIe they Ir hurt hU lien hut 1111 that she r ol their right to the th enjoyment of If courtesy url and consideration There are ur papers In this fre oln I r I I by Jy men Irl under Ir the of ut the might profit hy Ihl worthy example of ot ofa a Christian spirit