Show district court in the caso came of paler ilium vs chris una illum it WB was ordered that tiff pay tato into court within 13 15 days 25 lor for attorneys fee for defendant and 35 for of 0 defendant during euit suit an fand tiffi cleat to pay expense expenses of 0 bolt suit in the case of A wertz vs v 0 A luke on motion of smith smith order dismissing diamia slog appeal with boag coats under rule in the cae case of ellen W taylor vs edward T to taylor Y lor on motion of of kimball kimy allison Al liBon 0 order for defendant how show cause on july why he should mt py pay cert certain alti moneys into court I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 in re application reapplication of ol E T to dr practice e law or order d r was 80 iS leaned FIlled appointing pointing A it L II 11 it koe aj g er era and E cj it allian allisn to thamine applicant pl c ant cant the committed committee reported potted re ar la a on the examination 31 buchmiller vs s franl frank E I 1 dewitt on motion ol 01 kimball alli sot default of defendant F K E dewitt entered order tor for decree against F E dewitt and dismissal of complaint against M metzler |