Show AND A writer to the nell news S from provo prove gie out the on prohibition anti ami the of it being elac made an i buc abc in the comini fall biml e aien aign thi prohibition question i rom 1 s to be one of till the chief issue in the till tall campaign some political leider leder are of the opinion thit that it is a question that require great gaill in t treatment d i very difficult ques que tion to handle a matter that must be carefully Loni considered dered etc and the people ire guessing at and wonder in N whit hat the dirties will nil I 1 do v hether one part will ado cate prohibition or eanore the question iju estion and whether hether A mother will u ill idoft a loial local option platform or sa a nothing about prohibit tion there is one thing thine certain if the que question tion is left to the leaders to settle it anvill vi ill be settled fettled on oil the question of vote each pasty will adopt the platform plank on this asue sue that bill in the opinion of the leaders of the part secure the greatest number of note te for the parts part many of the voters of each fear that the will have hae to jie either their principles or their party put but there should not be the slightest peed need for a condition the prohibition qa question estion is not a political question idone one of cf the serious against the liquor interests is that the have hae mixed roli politics polities ties with ith their nihls whisker e the charges against the prohibition i 16 15 that they pro poe to mo prohibition hibi bibi tion pol arx tc the question IB 18 a moral and economic one and might be settled ba b the cili int le ie pard gard less of politics no reasonable person prohibitionist or anti anil prohibitionist zionist will den that it if it majority of nic lie N want j rowl roan lion they hane hae 2 i richt to have hae it nor that if a majority of the nonerl oter want the liquor traffic the have haie a right to that and they should hae bave a richt to determine thin on the merits of the question without jiing mi ing it with hiah protective garitt or the election of united states senators h bl a direct vote of the or other proter proper party li eues and it is IB eu bu ess easy to do it it if the voters loters of if both parties will sin si to the conventions ate ve demand thit that the people be fiven an to note te for or gaint prohibition at the next election and we e demand that our nominees for office pledge is s to carry carr out the will ot the people after election it will ill all be fettled then if the prohibit zionists are in the majority maio maici rity we will have hae prohibition till such a time as th anti prohibitionists can an covert connert them that prohibition is ie brunz if the anti are in the maiori tN ve will have the liquor frallic till the anti prohibitionists can be converted by argument and experience that the liquor traffic is wrong ro ng Is there any an reasonable ob lection that can an be brought against euch a i method of handling the th question except that it will settle the question attempting Attempt ine inz to settle bettle it by ardi ordnary nary political party methods leaves it like a locomotive off the track making a big disturbance but getting re no here and anait it ill IB not a fair wy way to all the citizenly citizen li to male make it a political leue it is not wet to require a voter who is a prohibitionist in principle to vote note against prohibition because his party maa have adopted an anti prohibition platform nor to require av avater ter who belian in the liquor traffic to vote for prohibition became his party has adopted a prohibition plat rm nothing new to in claimed for the method it 11 i li adopted in other communities where the people have had more experience with liquor kyi and it works very ery and it is conducts ic to good mccause it places on the people the responsibility of regu regulating latino the affairs for the benefit to the people |