| OCR Text |
Show ASKS ENVOY PAGE I 10 EXPLAW SPEECH AMBASSADOR TO GREAT BRITAIN MAKES ADDRESS WHICH STARTS TROUBLE. resolution! Adopted fc Senate Calling Call-ing for an Investigation cf Alleged Public Assertion Relative to Monroe Doctrine and Canal. Wa.ililiiK'im Walter Him-H I'iiK--, A rn'-rlf'aii ani lta.ia'l'r t'j t.r'-at I'l'll-iiln, I'l'll-iiln, v.un mail- tlm tarK't of lii'luiry In a rt-HoIutUiti ailopt'-'j !y th- h'-u-;i r .r (in Tliuraday, tailing iiik.ii tin- ; r,-tary i,t Htatis to InvchtiKalu ii 11 k-1 pulillc UMHcrtloiiH hy tht; am ha. hailir relative to tliu Moiiroi: dm trim- anil thi; Panama canal. Hnnator CLiim-bwIuln, ariaiHfl ov-r n-portH of a Hn-crti l,y Amliah.sador I'aK" In London, licforc tin AhHociat--d Chamlicr of Coiiinn-rci', Introduced the rcHolntlon of liniilry and Ms re-(U(-nt for linnicdlatir consideration r-1-Hiiltcd In Us aiUntiun without debate. Tlin rcMolutlon ri.-(uestH tlin becrttary of Htati to procure a copy for tin; me of the Hcnato of Amiiasnaiior rage u addrcHH, and to tall upon tile ainlias-Kador ainlias-Kador for rvldeiice upon whh h bn haHed tlin alleged Htatcnient that "It' added greatly to tho pleaHun; of the people of the ('tilted States In the tiullilliiK of tin; Panama canal to know that the Itrltlali would profit most by Hh uhi;." Particular reqm'Ht l made In the resolution for u V(;rliatlm report of that part of the einbassudor'B address la which ho In reported to have defined de-fined the, Monroe doctrine as meaning merely that "the United States would prefer that no Kuropeun governments would galu more lalnd lu the new world." |
