Show READER HEADER depends DEFENDS IN AIRMAIL controversy E gsg y exception to what the times sald in it an editorial paragraph last weel wed concerning colonel lingbergh Is noted by albert at marsden who writes from salt lake city as follows dear editor I 1 am wondering it you will note a friendly exception for mo me it to what you state stala about col clias chas A lindbergh in the last issue of the times in fairness to your readers I 1 think fill other side of the air mall mail controversy tro versy calls tor for some comment in 1 explanation of col lindberge Lind bergs stand to me the ruthless disregard tor for constitutional and right that wits was exemplified in ili the abrupt concel cancellation lation of via ali air mail pontiac is is a thing thine do chirt aty aiming iming american can call condino con dinc the institution grants to every person ills day lar lit in court and aej file to lo be heard it la is a bior fian dan heloun expedient to in jus kev winn ie it of our sets itself up a 03 3 bobil abuser and judee it wa to prent this kvia hat the tha or of the constitution in ll it continued to back pate rE HEATER AIER DEPENDS DEFENDS LINDBERGH IN AM AIR MAIL controversy continued from front page nr r tri parte system ot of government viz legislative Exe executive cutlo and ju dacial departments each cadi with PP brato functions and duties under llila system each division has hai arv fd ed ns as a check and balatico bila uco against tho the other and thus the liberties ind ami rights of 0 fb h people I 1 glory in the stamina ol of col lindberg to stand up for the privilege that should have been ac cordel 1 company he represented no executive official or senate committee hai ever been clothed with proper r authority to adjudicate the rights of the parties here concerned and simply because the sovereign rower power must consent before it can call bo be is no reason why the administration should not have submitted the issue to proper judicial determination mi nation before acting in fit the matter to have done otherwise Is unjustifiable and discriminatory and is 11 wholly out of 0 accord with american institutions institution tradition and I 1 was in now new york when col lindberg made ills his famous flight to paris and I 1 vividly recall the thrill that electrified the nation when his 1 sate safe arrival in parts paris was announced d the stamina courage and character that mark marked r the man then has proven genuine in tile the troubled years that have followed ills contribution trib ution to our national fame progress anil and development has been immeasurable As tor for publicity he would have none of it publicity is tho very thing lie he has modestly ghlea from sometimes and to the disappointment of walting waiting committees committee and anxious audiences As tor for holding an outstretch ed hand behind him while justifying his position in the air mall mail dispute no description could be farther from the truth col lindberg did not become technical advisor to T W A and pan american airways because 0 of money As lie he has recently testified he had many other lucrative positions offered him which the more avaricious averi cious and less genteel would have accepted but lie he chose chosa a vocation where his knowledge and talents have proven to be a most rueful contribution to the progress Rs of the world sincerely yours albert af marsden den |