Show DISTRICT COURT the caso case of the ople vs ys J st ferrin grand jury Ite port rl i at 10 t this hii morning coart cou rt opened and nid n application ol 01 J D leman attorney for plaintiff the case of iverson vs kayron kayson was dismissed wd at plaintiff Is s cost the grand jury came into court and returned a batch ot indictments i alie r I 1 charges ali arges a against dinst IV V holbrook and J I 1 IV V mclennan were ignored among tle the indictments was one nue agai net john melvin ullo ns his ain wife w ife a few months ago and who 1 it 1 now in custody on tho the request of air ili hiles es it ts ordered t eliat il defend d ant 10 brought into court to tomorrow morrow morning for arraignment captain smith cepres represents el its the defendant the case of the people vs forrin was taken up and a jur jury q imp impanel aneller anel led in this ea e james 31 1 I errin crr inand and W ferrin are charged with wilfully I 1 dw ahl maliciously obstructing and de a certain w ator ater ditch the property of james ST chambers ambera Ch and 1 E W V chambers dt at eden on oil juno june iett at f tiie question involved is I 1 one of prior right the complaining vi it claim that they hey look took hater water on to their land through a certain ditch which is on defendants property for several years carn without ref restraint I 1 but last years defendants objected pul in a dam filled up alio dik h ana and I 1 use the he water I 1 em selves tile defense PL vill will cl claim ahn that they had a perfect ier right to do all this it i they wis wished led to by ay iy reason of prior a |