OCR Text |
Show BID NOT EAT WITH HER m PAYS I ' In the divorce case of Amelia Stone DfciUnsi Lewis Stone, tho defendant Las filed an answer and cross-complaint The answer makes a general denial of the allegations of the com-p'alnt, com-p'alnt, asserting specifically that the property of the defendant is not worth more than $t,0U0. The complaint alleged al-leged that it is wortli $,(mmi. In the cross complaint Mr Stone stales that uls wife is of an uncontrollable uncontrol-lable temper and that .she is, and has been, for pome time kh, impetuous, cruel and quarrelsome, often times uswig Improper language toward him, oiling him vile and unreasonable names. He states that because of her misuse of the children, ouo of tho girls ran away from home in October of this ear and that she at various times has left the home. Mr. Stone says that in August, 190D, Mrs. Stone left home and went to Missouri, where she remained until July of this year and thai when she came back she was ill tempered and created considerable trouble in the fj.mlly. Ho also states that for forty days prior to the suit Instituted b rer she refused to seat at the table villi him. lie asks that u decree of divorce be granted, but that MtV;. Sione go hence without any part of the property. In her complaint Mrs. Stone charged Mr. Stone wilh habitual drunkenness. This he denies, but states that he takes a drink occasionally and has become be-come intoxicated at times He emphatically em-phatically says, though, that he Is i;ot an habitual drunkard. There are eight children in the fam-i'y, fam-i'y, three of whom are under age. |