OCR Text |
Show PIONEER SUGAR FILES ANSWER 1 Separate Reply to Complaint Com-plaint in Intervention Suit Lodged in Court A separate answer was filed yester-I yester-I day by the Pioneer Sugar company to I tho complaint in Intervention of the j I nion Trust company of San Francisco Fran-cisco in the case of E. A. Stratford I against the l'ingree Sugar company, I tho Hooper Sugar company, Inter-State Inter-State Sugar company, Pioneer Sugar '; company, Columbia Trust company, Fi nest ft. Woolley, A. C. Sullivan and the Union Trust company, which Is now pending in the district court bore In answering the Pioneer Sugar I company admits the execution and d -I livery by tho I'lngreo Sugar company on December 11. 1918, of a deed of, trust and mortgage OB set forth In the 1 complaint In Intervention and also the ; issuance of bonds pursuant to the de- 1 , livery of the deed of trust uggregat- 1 ! Ing $535,000. BONDS ot RED. It Is also admitted In the answer !that In April 1 9 L" 1 tho defendant ac-: quired 607 outstanding bonds of the j par value of $1,000,000. together with' all interest coupons none of which have been puld and tho defendant 1-, , I still owner. After acquiring the! bonds, it Is set forth that the defendant defend-ant deposited them with the plaintiff In Intervention to hold for the use and benefit of the defendant. The defendant defend-ant sugar company sets forth that upon-any foreclosure or the deed It Is entitled to the moneys realized paid to 11 in discharge of the 507 bond e and InU rest. s PART OF STOCK in answer the Pioneer Sugar company com-pany turlher d i lares It Is owner and holder of a largo amount of capital stock of the interstate Siyar company and has made and executed to the plaintiff In Intervention a sufficient bond and obligation for payment to the owners and holders of js additional addi-tional bonds and that the nlalntiff has brought suit in intervention and prosecutes the suit without the con- j sent of the defendant and contrary' to ' its wishes and Instructions. INTERSTATE t OMPANY. Further, the Pioneer company al-( leges that It is owner of 70. 000 shares, of common and 5.000 shares of preferred pre-ferred stock of the interstate Sugar, company and that as owner of the 507 1 bonds It Is opposed to foreclosure of the deed of trust, upon property or any property described in tho com-! plaint in intervention. Dismissal of the complaint In Intervention In-tervention is asked by the Pioneer , Sugar company in the answer which' was filed by the law firm of .Marion-' Saul and Keck of Salt Iake. |