OCR Text |
Show Jury Impanelled for Saudall-Holley Suit' With the impanelling of a jury this morning In George S. Barker's division divi-sion of the district court the case of omai E. Snndall against fhe Hol-lev Hol-lev Milling Company, opened. In his ; complaint. Mr. S i ndall ets forth that : while employed by the milling com- ' rim n I I,., mi rnVin oarl aihoa t MaliA I : under an agreement to receive three cents each 100 pounds as commls-; commls-; sion. He- seta forth that his commission I during the time of employment totaled $862.61. but he has received but $550. He ' laims, a balance of $312.61 is due in addition to the sum of $21.63 for demurrage charges, he alleges he paid : for the milling company Mr. Sandal! San-dal! atsks judgment and costs of the suit. lO answer to the complaint the milling company admits the employ-i employ-i i nt of Bandall, but declares that un-: un-: di r the terms of employment, Sandal) was to purchase only good, mlllablc wheat. By reason of his acceptance of certain wheat, the company alleges al-leges It has been damaged to the extent ex-tent of $3,250, but asks ho judgment against Sundall other than thc suit against the company be dismissed. I oo |