Show THE PROBLEM vindicating f clainos Ela policy inos south am W W V U to jan jail washington AVaB hington to there sett no to be a special a between th the veracity of question mcgion whet whether ir I and blame blaine as to president real ent of instructions the letter president saw I the he it was tr t Trescott to Trea colt before ee bent n president eaid said tile blaine yesterday of member saw all alio lottor letter A well posted says sas IS the administration t tile facts I are it is t true rue the dent original draft of t r the tile letter of the oi saw instructions in the ila hands ads of blaino blaine but the i and suggested son sonio jo changes instructions which were ua ultimately Iti I T ft ere not the sent liuna to the provident Pro directed dir eted t to bo in hub stanco tile theoria in but were nt bent be written by bla blano blan i n C with w tho tile e x read moal modifications bo be mage made by t thia ht president omitted itil tile ted ath conaw A gentie tri all hwd the nt lit peruvian com company lIny ten apts which certain ertain newspaper are fire aay y making to chov viti ith was in any respect absolutely tile perm peru ian jail chise the 01 objects jocas of the Col Pally are to pay pal r a fair war indemnity chill chili and see secure ure in exchange to recognition niti ork by tho the gove govern rn ment of pern perti of tho the made madl by one third of tho tile discoveries them of the guano a and nd nitrate deposits he government elit of peru had promised tills this one third hird to every discovery of valuable de deposits ts upon I aits nits its public donop domain 11 dam ets t aitio M to at feast least ti d rs du aco front peru by tir clies I averted ed ie to v not bo be gal in iho the parm n and A atiat is i a of A rk an company citizens danto the blawd e i aho bb nent ment w will 11 show mr shepherd ot 01 th iho rights sf the 77 coin company ny in in any ct lie ile maintained it was a subject for future determination by peru ill had I the administration Ilo however wever resolutely opposed the annexation of Pe peruvian nivian territory byC by CI chili as blaine maine desir desired edthe the peru peruvian v in company pany would have cared very little for lie the opposition of blaine or any other individual na nal peru perit is million dol dollars larsin in debt and her securities are absolutes absolutely tel ly worthless the tile estimated value of the cochet claim with interest rt ie is yon you will see how utterly it was for peru alone to have paid bebout her outstanding indebtedness indebted but to have satisfied the peruvian ourn company pany was where I the lie strength of the company lay the natural re of or tho tile guano gunno deposits are worth infinitely more than tit the e moat most agana value even placed upon the gochet claim more antin of the f facts a eta condee tea with taw forti peruvian ian daime claims ie Is likely to show that graid grant t Is te quite ae as of censure as shepherd and hulburt ar r at least as much so an shepherd for both grant nod and shepherd are private citizens grant unless ho wae misrepresented by shepherd wits an energetic 11 ti e prompter of the nitrate chemes ache iaea 11 iii his name was freely need ivied here by shepherd in support of I hie is lob lobbying living efforts and it ie is known that ho he wis was to be one of the fa carilous rilous w who ho ho hoped d I to secure the influence of iho tile U S government to further their private interests the state department suppressed pressed the names nemes that appear i in 11 the shepherd ance of these fortyune forty five uve were of private firms the rest were public c men |