Show SUPREME COURT REVERSES AN IMPORTANT DECISION In an opinion handed down by the supreme court yesterday In the case of George T Ensign vs 5 the Colorado O company a ruling Is made to the effect that a certain con contract contract contract I tract entered Into between plaintiff and defendant is unconscionable The Tho lower court is reversed and the case I is remanded to lo tho the trial court with I directions to vacate the findings and Judgment and an to grant a new trial The defendant Is a building and loan association with headquarters In Den Denver Denyer Denver ver yer and Ensign was one of or Its mem hers bels and the tile suit grew out Ott of differences ces that arose aros over oer the loan lonn of 1000 secured by plaintiff from defendant The amount was covered by a note to the Deseret Savings bank and a l simi similar similar lar note to the loan lo n association the latter to pay the tile bank in case Ensign paid the UIO loan company When Ensign had paid pail the association the company com pan maintained that he still sun owed them 4 G 98 and owed tho tim bank ban Ie At this rate the tho supreme court holds that with such a state of affairs Tt It would take Ensign 50 60 years to lo pay off of the Indebtedness and that It would woul amount to a total of oC |