Show I WRIT IS I BY SUPREME COURT I I The Tue supreme court handed down nn an OPinion granting the of oC the for a writ wilt of In Inthe Inthe the ca cate c of tin State Statu ex cx reI rd E a A Wai Tal Talton ton toil tho ho Third District court I it T I Judge find amid la and wife The opinion lire hi hits JUlI Judge o from taking Jur in III a case aled to the district l court rota a justice court and aud from taking nu any further action In the or orA A ju Judgment was In n a Jims court b by the Coalville Coop Mol In against Edward anti and wife 11 I I I I I and on February 4 following the lac Ilae lackeys keys ken served notice of appeal un tIle the attorney r for Cor the Coop hut hilt dill did not HIe Jib the until February 5 Thu Tho transcript or on appeal show a L t entry In the tho court or of the Iho fil filIng lag Ing of an all on appeal the original or COil thereof wax was not In the tiles tile transmit ted teI to lie tho court Neither dId the tho of flit tho Justice court show any noLice of th the tiling of the lie hond or copy COlY of lie bond hond had been heen served on the lie adverse party part When the lie appeal was 1 In lie district court the attorney for lie tho Coop moved that thal the appeal be dis on the he ground that the tho court had no jurisdiction over mer the case Judge Ritchie denied the whereupon an application was made mado to the supreme court for fol a writ of oC In III granting the lie I writ the court holds that the notice of oC appeal must be filed before it Is served sered on the adverse party and that the tho notice of filing of oC the undertaking on appeal be served UPOn the adverse par part party t ty These two matters It Is held are materIal and are prerequisites to of ef effecting an appeal and without a corn com with the statutes In these reo re the distrIct court could have havo no jurisdiction over the case casc The opinion was wrItten ritten by Chief rind and concurred In b by Justices Frick and McCarty |