Show DIS CASES Action Taken In Acco ance With Supreme Court Ruling Rilling Drea B Bv D rea reason on of ot the ree recent nt ruling ot of the supreme court of ot Utah which holds that Blat cities hae have ta e no to enact ordinances for tor- forbidding for bidding the ha In Inot of ot liquor In the case against J 3 omeo Bartholomeo was ass dismissed in the city court this morning mornine upon mo- mo motion mo motion tion of oC A Assistant City Attorney Samuel C Powell 10 Mr Ir Powell ell cx- cx ex explained to the court that the Ute city will nil have Ivie no jurisdiction in the possession pos pos- possession pos possession session cases as a L result of ot the de- de decision decision de decision of ot the high tribunal and stated that all caseS c now pending In which the cit city has filed tiled charges will hi b d dismissed Ism County Attorney David Daid J Wilson W said that he would file ide state st char charges ls l's in the cases ses where h re the city withdrew but only In those where wherein here hereIn In his opinion ther was as sufficient evidence e to prosecute It Is unlikely that th a state stale case caso will be Wed flied against for Cor the reason that onlY omy about I- I quarter of ot a pint of ot liquor we a found Cound in a basement adjoining It 11 1 soft drink parlor parlo and the ont ant denied all kno knowledge ledge of oC own own- own ho I o action will probably be betaken betaken taken talen by the state Mate In this case It was Intimated |