Show PROHIBITION N LAW I UPHELD BY HAYNES I I ST PAUL MInn Feb reb Pub 20 20 Pub Pub lie tie support of the facts as they are areIs is 18 necessary to defeat the efforts In certain quarters to to create the ins ins- Impression Im Impression that prohibition law In en- en enforcement ment has haa broken down Pro Pro- Pro Prohibition Commissioner loller H nez nes do- do de declared dared in an tn address here before a f conference Lack of strong public In some localities In faso favor of en- en enforcement en enforcement said Mr Haynos Hanos has re resulted re- re suited In almost complete of citizens forces courts prosecutors and juries ha have hate 0 but If it any sense of public sup sup- sup I 1101 lOt t Such a condition he ad added e I I is ft 1 n crying shame and where en- en en enrol to tom rol cement Is I least satisfactory this I 1 Is always Alwa s found I en-I Commissioner Ha JIa nes de however he did not believe bellove the tha of enforcement are ars dis- dis discouraged dis discouraged I but on the tho other hand It I seen seems to be the en enemies of very sery cry largely that are lire so eon eon- con concerned cern Id I'd over oser 0 er the failure as liS they see It It of ot enforcement after a three I or four tour year lear trial Has It H was as not I ex-I cx- cx ex expected that enforcement would closely approximate per cent success in three tour four 10 or 12 11 1 yeal years after aftel the adoption of ot the hW We Ve exp expected reasonable progress through h persistent calm patient sincere application to that end enil The Tho pointed to a 0 total of eases cases case made b by fed tod- federal fed federal eral agents against s violator since last July with Ith conviction and aDd near nearly 2 S in tin tines os as Indicating 1 In en- en f cn-f tOI 01 cement Content |