| Show THAT KNIFE EPISODE the cronin jurors still List ming 0 o arguments if 18 he donld bot aej if gnile hi mil lot hail tag pec 2 at hie opening of the cronin case this mornion testimony aa taken in the rebuttal 0 that presented regarding the knives aid to have been found on felien anton lowenst in a tailor paid he hae knives similar to them on apici jake Lotten tein acrons brother and Cough lina partner on the detective force snore that conghlin owned two such judda king then resumed bis argument to the jury on behalf 01 lie detente mr alog continued his review 0 ue evidence and coming down to the two anivea supposed to be aronina Cr onina eald this question is very easily of bitao propositions first coughlin is either guilty or innocent 1 innocent he could not have had it they were Cr onina if guilty he would not have had them if they were aronius Cr onius those two plain propositions in the mind of any reasoning reiso ning man would be the end of that episode the laet and grand climax that the gave to we of suspicion against theeo men juile wing then took dp the question of alie alleged conspiracy in camp 20 the state ho said had to make out a this case would not ba maintained in any court of jus ice against deen dans the fat of a conspiracy was established kiyond all reasonable doubt speaking of the mays in which to establish a conspiracy sp iracy you can consider all proven facts and from that infer the conspiracy con piracy conspiracy is proven by that procesa beyond all reasonable doubt it is fair and it is under he law that hen are wee liing adv circumstance egwim t coughlin Cough lio you look at that cir in he liblit of the law but not in alie light of the adds proven against another man I 1 object to aliis jury or court taking a partly proven conspiracy and from it giving color and character to individual circum atances and acu proven against my client sir wing then went on tl say lie had net er heard presented BO absurd a theory as the stole presents in this case the state pretends he aard that there ire a fah ieli it considered lead to the conclusion of c acda pendent of camp 20 that Is not material alie question is whether the acts proven the men on trial indicate they etere criminal antici conspiracy which resulted in croninn deit ti it may be his deah did result from a conspiracy but that li not what you aej here to try if it Is uncertain then there must be an acquittal and that there is an about it from incel caption to end la most demonstrated the speaker then went on to arena that various ad lucca in evidence to show connection Mil lithe crime were consistent v ath the theory of As to aba noted dormi avei it it were the animal which drew cronin to hie death still might ba innocent lie might not havo known wt at the man from michigan wanted it lor |
