Show VAN WAGONER GETS VERDICT IN LONG FOUGHT LAND CASE la ie to of tic most important ta asee sea I 1 lat at hat beu I 1 f r re tie state aprem echi rt arr r st erdi alq ar flit in 0 u o tri afat lei hell that title to tite I lanis Is beannt be otta olta inel 1 tv 1 sel 1011 1 an As 1 the mate state tin tit link ini i written writ tell tn justice bainum it H ti T druian is i in tit kiil cg of 1 I alk it t latr J nl ni i st rat 1 f tit the 0 alt of 0 geoff 0 r d as a I 1 aid ai J ftp jy acs e 1 I 1 ill i mi nil I 1 ti tit state i f utah bv b t 1 it I 1 t f I 1 ail I 1 I 1 in i si 1 liblit as a in re til tit a 0 tion aaa I 1 ro g t t L acon er I 1 m 1 11 tt 1 r 3 aeres lit 2 f t ul lisl i it I 1 so id ill range 13 ast cast in lit all i 31 ewt m t nil mil I 1 la a i ages f fir r the re if it I 1 r 1 ert tt it iraq br ill in tie anth sleuth district court agalise ceora t tit ant peter V jnes mr wl atmore cla tating itie title by adease possession poe poi session gion nn put I 1 mr jones claiming lainie lai nim ondrel owner elip ip as mr A hit more 8 agent the land in wa was sold by the state tu to the plaintiff air wagoner Aa INa goner the state ate claiming tini nung title tu to it by teason reason of its it leing among tha tho set e tiona reserved as state school lanly th state ate board of I lind ind acre inter intervened vend in the ease claiming to be at a i interested in party when J W e toh tok ner mer the matter as a 4 f the estate of the dt deceased ceased gyuire C le a counterclaim aa tild for the value if the me pla rd III oil the lie jrp tap carty by hie his eta e in 11 t I 1 tt ant t t i t that it shou tild be adjudged iguina t hili judge george of lie he se tenth dietrict district court fund te the in favor of the plaintiff and bo he stat tat bogli as to the title to the lands ands and as to the alue of the improvements made by the defendant the supreme court uphold the lover lower court in every particular and affirms the judgment f ft I 1 judge christensen Chrie teneen at the coel cost of the defendants the dereba ion log stion in thi this litigation wa was the question tion as to wl ether lether or not the statute of dimita tion aull permit the defendant to ac tie qumire auire title to tie t e I in IB lit I 1 y reason of haiir ha lial 1 adoro possession prior to ta tie 0 time it tie e ft t te tte afta ai granted the lanis male littler ain ler its state darter georgi C lii tinor I 1 a I 1 I 1 lid kid 1 os eion to thi this binl lan I 1 since ion long let I 1 ef e the state ell entend the lie lillon ml kill was wai bantel ran tel its falerni cl clifter arter d nine diring which timi he be Ine losel tie tle lani laul with a fince and male niale mariom other it 1 e he 1 the will ain 1 ant an 1 nut nil all other of re life of till stati itis 9 lie dil it I 1 not ply ax ai 9 on it tie 0 lai lal I 1 tin the lit rt I 1 olds that fr in ill ot I 1 allot arances an mil I 1 amun ine ili t tint at ti tit t 1 13 input of tae wib not re quirt I an ani I 1 that the intention of M it wort vai to holl to I 1 alters a ly y ani nit jilt in lit 1111 11 ordination to tip tl P state the coi it 11 tl aiom A e eem I 1 in to f faor a or the eon contention of appellant al 1 pella t tl tit at respond entel right of action was birrel amlien tic tie suit na commenced commence tie te tite conten lel low owr vr tl at 1 ich eh ai tie tl e lan an Is ere arant rant I 1 anler tic tie cn illin net act t the he of linn tat tie n ilo 1008 not 1 in I I 1 I 1 in ireae 1119 its conclusion conc cone lusio lulo 11 tin flit all u I 1 reme fourt court cites rles IN felt iros ilk i mil ih desota an all I 1 AA as ington in wl ill i li it tie c sul renie tourte I 1 it ca 11 I 1 that t t infiel nite I 1 mates for the file ua of its sc I 1 un L leitel nite I 1 state for the it uie i e of ii net 1 11 1 1 cannot be acquire 1 1 ion sion ne as ag dinst tie I 1 the 0 onro onee ant an 1 for all tic tie quntion stion if f teri alita in aw chere liere the latter bittle li 11 lan ian I 1 Is m aich at a liter viter late an art bantel I 1 to the aber hac ha lean en a number of cases it vol it 9 similar q liest if stion ions 4 but this is i tic tie time the cu buirt I 1 an rule I 1 on ta tie e question tie opinion ti tit til L title to the state chool school tiye teni of all alt iania lan in em embrace bracel I 1 in set ions 2 10 16 3 and 30 36 of every township in the bbate tite |