Show HEARINGS SET FOR WEBER RIVER adjudication SUIT formal notice has been mailed all water users on the weber river system setting date for hearing in the adjudication suit these hearings will start at Co coalville alville on thurs day may 28 at 10 A M and will later be continued at morgan and ogden the hearing at coalville Co alville will deal with matters relating particularly to summit county at morgan with those relating to morgan county and at ogden for those relating to weber and davis counties in order to comply with all legal technicalities notice has also been sent to those water users on the ogden river who are parties to the adjudication judi catlon suit there Is no at the present atme alme of hearing th the f various ogden river matters tor for the reason that in 1930 a stipulation was filed with the court and an order made adjusting the main contro versay between the users of water on the upper and lower ogden river in this order on the og den river time was allowed for the upper and lower users to adjust their differences in their respective areas ar aas for a number of weeks careful and intensive efforts by localizers localisers bocar users i have been made to revise their du ties as shown in the state engineers proposed determination and bring them more into accord with the actual practice having in mind however the limit of beneficial need and earlier priorities As a result of these efforts three separ ate petitions will be presented at the three local hearings which petitions will pray for a an order older ot oi the court making these revised duties the basis of distribution for a trial period ot of two years this cooperation of the water users usera and this method of settlement should save on the weber the tremendous amount of bf time and money which has been spent in other adjudication suits on oil litigation which has not really in the end brought about any different or better result than the method of cooperation it should be distinctly noted that the tiling filing of these petitions and action thereon does not in any way d deprive e pr I 1 ve those water users who have not participated in the cooperative efforts of their opportunity to present to the court at these hearings such matters as are proper for the protect protection I 1 on of th their el r own I 1 interests n te rests provided always that such parties did during the objecting period make record of their objection by filing the same with alth the clerk of the court while the law ts Is not absolutely defined it has been the practice of the courts to decree the right as set out in the state ate engineers proposed determination mi nation when no objection to such right has been filed the effort of this practice has been to relieve a great majority of the water water users from the necessity of appearing in court when the right as set out in the state engineers proposed determination Is reasonably satisfactory it is assumed that at the end of the two year trial period a further revision of rights can be so far as information gained during the trial period indicates plainly the propriety of such revision the court will of course retain jurisdiction in the cause and any glaring errors or mistakes can un doubt edly be corrected before the end of oe the two year trial period |