OCR Text |
Show is , .jl0SIJE28 ; . b, WNU Feature t! , received at the time, the I iS,,P0f action of the Taft-. Taft-. L before Judge Ben 5''jEy in Washington, was suspi-3 suspi-3 ::rSM;iness. Justice Frankfurter " ed that he saw evidence 5 Se job. The defendants ; s C 1 0 and its psalm-sing-'i: ident, Philip Murray, the r nfkid THE C.I.O. AND Ire latch-key pals Resident teuman. -' Verier, in effect, accused the fr3et of justice of slipping :V client a mickey finn. Ac-'Vte Ac-'Vte taow, and so does Frank-I Frank-I Jjf furter and so did furter and so did Moore, that the D. of J. was politically opposed to this law. It is a Republican Repub-lican law. The C.I.-0. C.I.-0. and Murray are not only Democrats but big contributors. contribu-tors. By the deci-' . ''J OS :?: r a' sp ' 0( Moore, who is also an " "'-d Democrat, his party, Mr. " -mail's party and the party of I 1, defendants would gain or lose ; slush fund of millions. . ' ,.d Moore's party hopefully Li t. him to ratify the use of I J moMy with which it could inpt the ballot in the 1948 pudental election. In an opln-iB opln-iB supporting the casuistical thp-lrap in the defendant's own Utical pamphlets, Moore justified justi-fied their hopes. Old Ben Moore nmt through. R i put it straight to Moore to say Ate he ever was or never was I. partner in a Charleston, W. Va., rf w firm which represents John L. Liwis and the United Mine Work-.rj Work-.rj I asked him to say also who ied him out of Charleston to lit in Washington and who assigned l(. a, to this case. j Moore wouldn't an- ' Ceil swer and, although In A'o my questions obvi-i. obvi-i. iMf ously had no bearing , ' on the Taft-Hartley it est, he threw in a slantwise men-it men-it con oi contempt. Well any citizen ie hd a right to ask those questions ad the bluff just made me more sspicious. However, if it was con-tempt con-tempt he should have done his stuff. NOW LET HIM CITE FRANK-FVETER FRANK-FVETER FOR CONTEMPT. We may get a more thorough statement of Frankfurter's suspi-' suspi-' tions and objections to the conduct tl the D. of J. when the opinions 8 i the supreme court are written, j I now have discovered an opin-t opin-t iin oi the fourth circuit eourt of appeals Bnanimous, too which his Moore out with the most Tiolent flogging of a federal judge bf a higher court that I have ever read. A baby boy, 13 months old, wandered wan-dered onto the railroad tracks and a yard engine cut off his hands. The first jury disagreed. The second Save the baby $100,000. The verdict , tas reversed on errors, but the ' court of appeals said also that the judgment was excessive. In the - third trial, before Judge Moore, the irj gave the baby $160,000. He re-feed re-feed to set it aside as excessive, tut the court of appeals said it cer- My was and figured that the boy I wild have an income of $4,800 a !"r for life and still leave an estate of $160,000. Recognizing the painful nature oi p & case, the court of appeals still a iKdemned Moore for inciting the a Ws sympathy and for "an ar-I ar-I tentative presentation which i have prejudiced the defend- 1 sot's case." J ,. One juror even 2 -'"we made an affidavit " that they all wrote i 'r!ra down a big figure, . added them up and '"'tt by 12 to get $160,000. 1 was for his treatment oi tive fireman and his par-: par-: , " 10 the plaintiff that the court 'Weals gave Moore thfi WQrs( 1 " bawling out. ' tee5nj'reman was corroborating i id nnfiT' en&ineer said he ' t!h"WsoifthetrackS. , e to three little boys about lcdel; m where the baby was. ! , ; f 2' tw the little boys 'hotter, of the baby. They 1 " mgmeer waved. - 0 RD KID SAID HE mvijj " fte engineer i "The 1uestion was, 4 know tha, he wasnTr. r 7, 1 didn'' se Urn Mm anyne.' ; "?' yon know he wasn'' it No' wasn't." '"return, , , !i OttmJl 'Sn'' the 9ne jj, 'n Know he wasn't way- he7t, (mterrnl"ine) "Xon know T. ym ia OT noU Do "ebody;, he wasn'' waine I si,, ' ee him waving. |