Show t We gladly publish the above because 1 it seems t that h at as t the h. h e writer says our r article has fallen far short of its purpose We certainly did not suppose that the very vey ones for whose benefit the article J. J was written would be the first to protest against it Is it possible that there is 0 any diligent student here who does not 1 r know that we have triflers among us bW and has not felt that they are an imposition imposition imposition tion t The only reason for placing the triflers in the particular class referred to is that they were observed in that particular 1 k class and that knowing the evil existed we wanted to get hold of something det de de- t finite It is fault not our that it was y- y composed largely of third y year ar y VV But as we have said most of the class r seemed to be doing good work and our rot remarks referred to the few who were 1 not The writer must have written his cri criticism without having read carefully the article he criticised since he he assumes assumes as- as as as- jo that it is aimed at the whole normal normal normal nor nor- mal body We cannot see how it is possible to to draw such an inference inference from it In conclusion the person who wrote j the editorial objected to is as competent r j to judge as anyone in the University t tWe We published it as an editorial because 1 we believed it was timely and came very near the truth r rte x |