OCR Text |
Show I r Dressing WeM. t n.Pjvs ' "f (,n of, the host wo-niJfs;'in wo-niJfs;'in P"15;";zillos recently raised the ' hurV , an a woman dress on one uMortm,orrs a rear?" He was very .,nl 13,0 in bis selection of women otic J'T ,'iR nation. The unani-fhw unani-fhw "U is absolutely, im- . nuppft',v! "'y a man wou,(1 a?k Slcn 'v invec!?"' 1 t'1"5'5 women real- r.:aVp ffT ator1 the matter, thev would 'arri'no. ,hfit a"rding to the wage- ve, Pft'latJr.n the income of the "Xpnrtti,W'0",!,p W0l,,d nrA justify the. h:rP.of ,1aIf at amount. In '"! r ',.l;v w.-nv-n of our country : e vorVMy (1o'!''s .a yepr. Where Pnis more than one hun- dred dollars for clothes two women spend less than fifty. Yet the latter lat-ter class of women are comfortably, neatly, and, in some cases, daintily clothed. One may venture the assertion asser-tion that they get as much satisfaction out of their clothes as their more ex-travagnnt ex-travagnnt sisters. The adjusting of one's income to on .? wants and necessities is a delightful de-lightful occupation, and many of the wealthiest women find much of the spice of life in the practice of small economies. It requires neither intelligence intel-ligence nor culture to merely spend a dollar, but to make one doftar do th.-work th.-work of three requires a master mind and cultured taste. If one 'could but lose sight of thy gaunt specter of necessity ne-cessity it would be far more interesting interest-ing to be poor, than to be rich. Yet it is doubtful if the average wifo of a man on a salary of $1,000 a vear can 1os-j sight of her limitations Ions enough to se the vast opportunities she has for the exercise of foresight system, and above all. the culture of her own will and character gained bv following her own systems and plan's ior expeditures after she has put the mon paper. |