Show VE DAYS OF WORK FOR MAY The Supreme Court Has Busy Docket Ahead for This Months Month's Term THREE CASES EACH DAY Railroad and Mining Company Suits Furnish Bulk of Work About twelve days days' ay work Vork is for time tho state Supreme court which viii wi ii i begIn Its Us sitting for Cor the time May Ia term today The Time docket which Pins has been heen ar- ar for tho limo term contains 27 eases cases and amid there lucre will wil be seven or eight more to come como before the time court bringing the total t tol number of ot cases which are arc to be bear argued ar up to about 3 30 35 Three cases will bo ho disposed of each day and amid as there mere are arc live five sittings each week th the court not being In session on Saturdays this will wi keep the time court In session un un- un til lii about May Ia 25 or 26 G. G The docket which hits has been made up for tho the court Is as follows May Iy 10 tate 10 State of utah against M. M o V. V 1 Bohen en- en Piquant state against Arthur Ar- Ar thur Brown wn appellant state against Nathaniel Williams appellant May Ia 11 State Il-State State against Joseph Bar Bar- her ker er respondent City against Fillmore Holler Holer Mill lj company appellant appel appel- hint lant lant appellant Julia Jula Murphy against n. n R L. L 1 Booth May 12 12 12 Bullion Beck and Champion Mining company against Eureka Hill Hi Mining company appellant Ryan Kyan appellant against Curlew Irrigation Imri gation company compan in the time matel matter of ot tIme the til estate of or Thomas Miller deceased Mam Miller ller and others against Ellz Elza- Elza heth LIvIngstone I administratrix lell ap- ap May 13 13 Joseph II H. Roberts and oth othi- ers appellants a against TV W. G. G Tutt and others other Partners co-Partners Leonora E Waddell f X executrix appellant against t William M 31 1 and amid others Utah Srn Savings and amid Trust company appellant against A Adeline Stout and M M. k n II II Wal ke ker r. r Wal-I Wal May Ia 14 1 14 William J. J Barrette Barretto appel appel- appellant lant Pant against S S. S A. A Whitney Lena Meyers against San Pedro Los Ios Angeles Salt Lake Uke Railway Sal Halway company appellant appellant appel appel- i lant Mary Etta Etin Ett Chambers a against C C. I- I rank Emery sh sheriff appellant May 17 17 17 H. H S S. Kozminsky appellant against n Oregon Oreon Short Line Lino Railway Hallway company llam William Brown Drown Jr ii appellant Halway against William llam T T. Owens Twenty Twenty- second corporation of at the Church of at Jesus Christ of Lter da Latter day Saints against the Oregon Short Line Railway company appellant May Ia IS Nick IS-Nick lc 18 Nick Jachetta b by his hits guar guam dian Wan Ralph Jachetta against time the gar gar- San P Pedro dro Los Angeles Salt Sail Lake Railway Railway Rail Rail- Rai- Rai way appellant company compan Scow Volker-Scow- croft Cot Lumber company compan appellant n against Mary 1 F. F Vance Mary I K E. Morris Morris Mor Mor- ris against t the e Oregon Short Line Lino Railway Railway Rail Rail- Rala Ral- Ral a way company compan appellant May rny 19 Annie I-Annle Annie F F. A. A Hilton Hion appellant appel appel- lant against Gideon Snyder and oth other other- G. G Harold larold Speight ht against the Rocky Mountain Bt Bell l Telephone company ap appellant ap- ap Mary R. R Schuyler Schuler and others against the time Southern Pacific Railway company appellant May Ia 20 f Florence Manufacturing company a against time the Pacific Express company compan appellant X N. p p. Madsen ra sen ap ap- ap against tho time Utah Light and lelant Italy Ral way company the time Grand Central Mining company compan a against the time Mammoth Mining company compan appellant I |