Show I ARE DISMISSED i IN COURT AT I I Resistance to One MOU Motion to That End n J E Earns Reprimand nl n I y r ri H i n Nov o sit e. o u a nl n t. t r of I criminal w were ro oit t ru the tho thor District I court I t herr horr- vi VI rf r being alleged lc I IThe The case that attracted oio t t. mitten atten- j l lion tion wa was t that o agaInst ln t rate Tato charged with Involuntary tn 1 I ter A motion to clear clor this from rom tuc court docket It brought t from J IId f Greenwood a n. n 8 11 severe reprimand r tr lall Tales Tale's counsel Attorney y It H t 1 C. C S Stott oto ot o of who resisted tIme the motion Jh The ease case had proceeded J to the choosIng choos- choos I lug Ing lu of A st jury juno when District l Attorney i iI i J J. J A. A Melville discovered that th Tate Ss is under IS 18 years of Qi f o age age- c. c Although h. h Mr lr I Stott lott wa Va examining proposed propos Juror jurors Mr l Melville I moved mol for or a dismissal on the ground that th the th defendant should properly prop come under the jurisdiction of or the Juvenile Ju court The Th law low allows allow time the juvenile ju COUt CoUtt Jurisdiction HV over l' l youths who nrc nr oc- oc ocI I cased provided that lh tIme the Juvenile ju court COUll shall Khali hn have no jurisdiction on a 0 felony telony charge In voluntary Involuntary is 18 generally general general- ly h considered oi a n felony charge Mr Ir Stott tott demurred to the proposed dismissal He U. even objected to the court asking aslIng the defendant h his age t claiming that that Iliac Will was already a 0 matter mattor mat mat- t ter tor I oi 01 ord i-fc-ord and anti I that hat a Q prisoner need not tp IH wh when n his hiM own OW Co case cose Is la on iii trial So Sn In lit nt was waH as Mr Stott that 1 I ur enwood wn was led It'd to k that this was time first th time he lie hail heard of or counsel objecting to 0 the tho dl dismissal dis I missal al of his client Jud Greenwood threatened to tu Mr Tate for II contempt con the theOther tempt u. for 01 attempting to override C court I Other T prisoners have been dismissed on the time ground lound that the time justice court records record do 10 not hOt show how that hat I proper preliminary pre lIre liell proceedings 8 wore Oll John Johnn An- An fl these were wert v. v Mi rt charged with r h burglary in the s. s second degree Art Arthur hu Howl charged rs' rs ed cd edwith with grand larceny W. W Clarence nO lloyd ll was declared not guilty of violating II a KuroKu ell city or ordinance or- or on an heard before A 0 jury jun Arthur Wilson charged c with robbing the million Bullion Heel Heck Mercantile company store at ot Eureka was od oil 1 to the hI state IndU Industrial school The case cane against J. J Walter l with embezzlement mb will b be hr oll Monday Ionn |