Show k MORRIS ORA DRAS VIS OUT OF CASE Richard P. P After Acting as Ju Juror Ju- Ju Says Mind Is Al Already Already Al- Al Already ready Made Up ASK FOR A CONTINUANCE E Democratic Candidate Mayor F Does Not Announce Decision Decision De Do- tc Until Late William convicted of or robbery for 01 relieving Deputy Sheriff Ira l of or his lo at Ding Ding- liam ham Junction May 7 last is mal making ing strenuous efforts ts to tu save sa himself from flom froma a U penitentiary sentence II Ills Illo Is motion muton F for 01 a a. n new trial will vIII come Wednesday da morning before Jud Judge wi c George Goorge G. G Arm rm rm- rm I r strong To Tu support It I Flemming Flemming has the tite following a II III I s signed ne l by Richard nichar P P. Morris Morris- Democratic can candidate candi cantli- i- i dato date for mayor nayor of Salt SaI Lake who was also ulso one of his jurors I I J 7 Richard P. P Morris being fl first t tul r duly ul sworn depose an and say I was a Juror in tho the above entitled case and und 4 that prior to the introduction of tho the f and before the evIdence e of or the tho defense motion molion of the thc defense for moton instruction was mado by I counsel for forthe forthe the defendant that my mind was vas hily fully ful hi- ly h an and completely made up ill as to tu the guilt guIt or tn O innocence of the thc defendant k as Charged lared in the thc against t f the lie defendant Some Somo comment has ha been caused amon among those who ho know ow of tho the aUd J. as to Mr I Morris Morris' orris' orris idea of his i duties as m. m a citizen One section of f the I law reads as follows r. r taw state Tho The jury must at each adjourn- adjourn ment be be- be admonished by ly the court thai thia- I it is their duty ditty ut not to converse con etc nor to o form or 01 express al any opinion thereon until the case is fn finally al sub submitted mUted to them I J nute Formed Opinion 1 Mi tir l' l Morris Morris' aUda shows that he ne ne had so tO formed fonne an opinion before the i conclusion of the lie trial in spite of tho the j I warning armIng as to his duty us a fl Juror gien gi given fj en by ly the court court Others however howe dorr do donot not tal take lut any cr very serious ic view of the mater matter rr I i do not think they can cn get a new trial on un such nn an affidavit said ait District Dis Dh- 4 C. C Loofbourow who I conducted the tho case a against Flemming If the thc evidence o of if even oven tile tie t witness wit vit- vit nc ness was so strong as to convince con a I. I juror he could not help hell 1101 that thaL that Mr r. r Morris violated no 10 oath ho had taken I as a juror these being heing simply imply to the tho effect that he approached the case I with wih a n fair fai an and Impartial mind He 1 might t easily do 0 so an and amid still ho convinced con con- vinced as CS to the thc guilt sult of or innocence of or the tho accused ed by the the first witness 4 On the other oilier hand the attorneys s 's for forthe forthe the he defense think they have grounds s stor for tor a new trial in that Mr 11 Morris clearly had Flemming convicted be before before be- be fore Flemming had had a word to toFa Fa say in his own defense I j fl e C Jury returned its Is unanimous y s after the m. m ln ti i sub n I |