Show SUIT NOT THE FIRST ONE Teamsters on Stand Had Well t Defined Opinions of Operation Oper Oper- t j J. atio of Carst Cars t JURY IS FINALLY ALL Y SECURED Brouck Tells How He Got J His f Others Others Have Had Like fi- fi j k Experiences 4 s That thero there are people In Ln Salt Sail Lake LaIo the thet who have hn opinions concerning t Utah Light and Railway company was f evidenced Friday morning In Iii Judge JudgeS r S V J Ritchie's court when an attempt wa wat was wasa S t S a ma mode made e to collect a n ju Jury to try thc the ac- ac w. w S lion of Otto Olto S. S Grow a against the company com corn Se Several It S pany any for damages S Jurors hail hal I. I because c th they fly the thc company com coin had hal opinions as to tho the way to 4 2 pany runs rune Its ca cars and others wont because e the they themselves cs had hall had i t. r t As theft the tho ther claims against the company compan r- r ft k Jury stands one member Andrewt Andrew t Poulson has ha been heen In an accident somewhat somewhat some some- 0 what similar to that for fOl which Grow Is trying Irrin to collect damages His claim S-n. S r f however howe was was was' against th the company compan settled d r J. J y Grow is a teamster antI and ho asserts F tr r that his wagon was run into by lW a n. car j 1 1 on fl Ninth East street at nt a a. place where i. i i U the roadway was narrow and It was drive c necessary arr for the wagons to I 2 alon along till tie track allowance He alleges t S. ne negligence li on the part of oC the motorman motorman motorman motor- motor man In falling failing to ring the gong Ho He and sevi sev- sev was thrown from the wa wagon on r- r i 1 fr r t eral bones bone were ere broken which he f S sa s Incapacitated him from flom woric t.- t. for sonic omo timeS time S S' S ft S'S t S ft t The nature of or Poulson's accident V- V y S for which ho was given damages b by V t I 5 J the tho company was not tally fully explained teamster He lie declared f though he Is IR a a. k 1 that ho had no bias bins a against the compan com com- f 5 pany pan on that account and his stateS state- state T r j i ment was allowed to stand S S K t- t JiNt t v llo Got It H. S M More ore trouble was waR experienced with 5 Heber Brouck another tam teamster ter who r. r k sat at beside Poulson He lIe was finally S peremptorily challenged ed although h not until tho the attorney had exhausted every S who want to work wont and help them them- thema a 1 l u Brouck told that ho Is fg a a- at t teamster 5 5 and had had a a. claim a against ln t the tue company com corn pany Jan some years ears ago although he lie def de- de f clar dared he ho had never ne said anything S about ItS it it The Thc company's attorney i S i described a a. hypothetical accident i. i somewhat similar to that told of h by r Grow In the complaint c It was wa just in fn that wa way that I was as f tX hurt asserted t tj the le juror Would you ou be willing if you OU were werey A y in the company's place to have a a- jur juror ju- ju r who was was in your our state of or mind try this case caso Yes I guess I would ten iT Do you ou think you could coul give this I case a fair fall and Impartial trial 1 I 1 guess I could said salti the juror I then he add added d I UJ Im know w that's not a oa a J Have HaYe you y ou some opinion against t the S. S company t. t No Ko sir Did you ou at tho time of or the accident acci acci- S 'S lent dent lent'S 1 2 S Well I thought it would have been beenS S t better if tile the motorman had not got tI 4 mad about it and tried tried u S histo of oS that Ai We c are not a asking a n. history S ti I accident ald the Iho attorney and he lie pa passed ed on to another question But f. f 5 i g Brouck was the first juror to go on onS S the tho peremptory challenge of ot the de deS defense de- de S 5 Got Cot the tho Worst ort of or It It It S W. W fl B. B Holt confessed ed to a bias 5 5 the Utah Light and Railway 1 company compan There was wag an old fight think I the tie worst of or M he sa said Ill I 1 got I g ft i it It He lie was one of tho those e excused for 5 ca cause Peter Madsen Madsea had what he supposed was a slight acquaintance with Grows Grow's attorneys s Has either acted acte as counsel for asked S you he was g No o the the- case was against me X He was also excused as was J. J W. W t whose firm had had a a- asuit at aE t E suit ull against the company compan George Naylor a lor another juror called caned to fill n a vacancy vacO was excused ed on the ground that he w was s wanted as a a- awit witness wit wit- 5 ness in the casei case cage ii rho The Jury was finally In Ine Inthe inthe i e the afternoon and i ix io made up of J Leo lino eo I D Dykes s 's James M M. Adams John M. M 1 Wheeler heeler Andrew Poulson Fred C. C I It Lynberg Harry C. C Joseph 5 Z Tate and William S. S Burton ShEETS CASE ASE CONTINUED CONTINUE S i Trial Gf Goes cS S Over O Until 3 on III lotion of or r tho tile Defense S. S i Former Former Chief Chic of 1 Police George A. A A. A Sheets again appeared In District court cour connection with the charge Friday In brought against him of or accepting a bribe e from the men who maneuvered i th robbery The hearing was on a motion that the case casc be he ills ills- 5 S T missed for lack of jurl jurisdiction 5 i t t. Sheets' Sheets attorney alleging that he lie was accused of two H separate parate on the theone theone theone one set of or facts fact Nothing was done however except to postpone the hearing hearing hear hoar ing un until III Monday londar September 23 This was vas done don on motion of Sheets' Sheets attorney E B. A. A Wedgwood c who with Soren N X Christensen en is handling the case District Attorney l F. F C. C Loofbourow Loofbourow Loof- Loof and his ap assistant In this case County Count Attorney Willard Hanson ma made e no objection The state did however ho file a n. protest a against the case cao being helm dismissed for COl lack hICk of or jurls jurisdiction The Thc matter and things alleged an and shown in defendants defendant's defendants defendant's defend defend- ants ant's plea plen to the jurls Jurisdiction of the court herein ar are not sufficient in law to lo Justify the court in abating the action ac- ac tion llon says l lS S Mr MiS 11 Loofbourow in the pl plea I I and he asks that Sheets h be he required to plead on the bribery Information I District i Court Walter Smith charged with n assault with a deadly weapon with intent to todo todo tollo do llo bod bodily II harm appeared In Ju Judge ge Armstrongs Armstrong's court Friday and a asked the Judge to appoint counsel J. J J F. F Tobin was named ns as s attorney and d guardian ad litem Stove Stevo Bobich anti and Mike e through h Nick Interpreter plea pleaded cd not guilty to a a. charge chorge of riot The prisoners are arc miners accused of disorders in connection with the smelter smelter ter er strike No 0 complaints were filed in the dIstrict district district dis dIs- dis- dis court Friday Frida possibly because It was Friday the 1 day of the ninth month Failure of any attorney to lo appear with a new now suit however r is h by byno byno no means unprecedented though h In these hese days ays of u it growing eit city it does oes not ot often n happen more mOl than once or twice a n month |