Show PROSPERITY PROSPER TOO MUCH FOR HILLS HILS Husband and Wife Dispute Over Property They Worked 25 Years to Get Get SPOUSE CLAIMS IT ALL NOW Thinks s She he Should Keep It Be- Be 1 ause pause Husband She Says I Is Incompetent Incompetent Now Xo that prosperous limes thues have han 1 come Elmer lUll Hill Hi of Bingham an and Mrs Mis Jennie E. E lull Hill Hi who were were married mar mar- lied ried 21 t years ago are unable to agree on the tile management of or their property HIM Hi deeded hl hi his estate over to his wife when he was sick at Ut th beginning of la last t year eal Now ow 10 ho declares he Ie has recovered and he wants want the property back His wife wie says he ha hasn't mt reco ered erell Wherefore the they havo have taken the matter Into court Hill Hi filed fed his ImIs complaint sonic some time ago asking a restraining order to prevent pre pre- vent ent his wife wie from disposing of tho the property until an accounting wits was WiS ma made e and that she be compelled to deed eed pac back the hc money 1 mining stock tock and cal ical e estate tate he had given gl en her when on what he supposed might be his death-bed death January 2 1906 Since January Januar 2 1906 runs the wife's answer flied filed fed Wednesday Hill Hi has developed a somewhat o obscure cure mental disease e which has progressed to such an au extent that ho Ito Is and for fora a Ion long time has hascen been cen Incompetent to manage an any estate of value alue and it is necessary that ho lie should be e protected from the tile schemes of designing persons persons per per- sons SOIlS who from flom time to time excite suspicion suspicion sus sus- in his Itis mind of this defendant so that at stated Muted times an and for brief rief periods period only ho ie Is distrustful of defendant de- de defendant defendant de de- an antl expresses e SES a desire to get gel one half of the tho property now held by defendant ant into his own han hands s that notwithstanding nil all al this plaintiff and defendant during all al tile the times here herc 1 mentioned have been and now arc alC living 1 liv li In lag ing together as husband and and wife consulting con coIl suiting and a advising with each other as such uch Dispute O cr Properly No o divorce is asked by either party to the suit sui nor not do o thc they make any al allegations ah- ah legations of or dispute i except as to the tile property of the family and the Ito method method meth meth- od ody by y which that was obtained On his supposed deathbed Hill Hi deeded to his ills wife 31 shares in the Mining company compan which were wards afterwards disposed of for fOl 3 3 mining min tho the Brooks Erool s and amId lag ins claims for which Mrs I Hill is now declared to hold shares In the e Copper Coppel Mining company company com coma pany ranY the lie hotel ilOt l on eu tho the rou reserve interests s In III the and amid American Amerian claims sold afterwards to the time Standard Copper company for interests tg In Iii the Blue Bue Rock nock Champion Social Socia Fritz Mid Regulation claims nil all al in iii the thie West cst lU district Mountain In All AU this this- and more 1111 no- no nc-J nc thle l but ut tho tho prop she and de- de plaintiff sa ays was acquired by and marriage nearl nearly cn since their a i quartet quarter of a a. century ago aco by their joint effort und timid labor Hill Hm on un the theother thor other hand hund alleges that ho he dl did It all ahl and aud that his hs wife's work was wa confined do to such uch as ns ag a wife should naturally for her bier h husband Mrs Ir lull Hill Hi howe er however says ay that from front January 1883 to 1900 hc took In sewing and thereby y contributed COI- COI con comi- to the joint support of the time family while Hill 11 was doln doing assessment assessment assess assess- ment work worle on the mining properties Since 1903 when the hotel hotel ho ho- tel which co cost t OOOO was opened the she says tho the revenue lc from Crom that host- host lery buy ha has supported tell the both of oC them She conducts this thIs In addition to which sh she refers to five H houses they tiley acquired four foul of ot them last year and this and a asserts erts that the revenue rc from frol these has gone one to enlarging the hotel at a cost of GOO Has las Not Chun l Will Wi Mrs Hill lm denies that she has made madea a will leaving her property to someone someone some someone one wi other than her lieu husband She he stales states that by mutual consent both made their wills early in 1906 each leaving whatever property the they had has hag not nol to the tile other and that she sho chan changed ed her testament nor nOl will wi she sho She Site den denies Ie that she has his kept her husband husband hus bus band without money saying that he helias heins the revenue re from one of lias ins ha had the houses amounting to 30 30 a month and that he has for his own use helped himself h from the joint family purse Her answer Mrs Hill apparently accounting for the sufficient takes toke as a asks funds in iii her possession und and she that the tho complaint be e dismissed ell al alleging al- al leg leg-In that thal her husband and Is Incompetent Incompetent incompetent tent to hold manage or care carO for an any mentioned in iii tho time com com- of the tue property plaint |