Show LOSES IN SUPREME COURT GOURT F Former For rn l' l J Judge dge ge Sought to Force Fore P PaY Payment y-n y n ent nt of Mileage Mlles ge Said to Be Bc Due The supreme court rendered re a c Thursday in nn an application flied In n It ifa It s final Jurls diction by Thomas eaux for or a t writ rit mandato against of mandate directed applicant the tho state slate hoard board of of examiners The fhe stag s that at he was fudge of or h tr i-tr the Fifth i jU judicial le lal district from rom 1901 to 10 T WIP January iso 1903 and presented 5 tn to Governor J. J C. C Cutler Culler a 0 member or of th uJ board boar JU on t August in A August 21 1995 1241 1 a bill for or ml mile mile- agO and expenses of his TU dunes es Incurred In as the 3 performance per per- ta as judge hut but ment Te t was as r refused The fhe amount n payTe payment pay pay- nr L oy uy JU JUURO o Marioneaux is which h he j states slates was aB the amount of or his traveling trl I hot expenses from rom April 4 1 1900 i w 7 to lo Novem No 10 ber oer 18 18 1901 The The- board hoard of examiners rc re- the bill on the rite ground that the members believed that the they had iio n no au- au lion uon If thorny r of oC la law to pay it ft The Tho or of the slate aisle section CO 0 article i F. F says provided b F by law lav law th the s salaries of the supreme court judges es and lJ nr tho the court judges shill shall l he be I r If per annum and ad n quarterly P. P mileage eo payable out of oC tho state treasury In 11 1941 nn act net w as s vise passed by bJ the tho lesh legislature of the state had based on all this clause clauS of or the constitution In In OJ another act at was vas passed parsed h by the tho legislature fixing the salaries sala sala- I rles ries of the Judges jUdgeR of or the state stale at Iw a n. year ear and anti not allowing mileage or ex ox- senses Tu Judge e Marioneaux asked the tho su preme promo court for a n writ of mandate compelling com com- the board to pa pay him the amount of r his bill bij his contention ln being that th the act neL cl of at 1001 1241 Il had never been repealed by the tho ho legislature it being still sUIl In force after aCter tho the passage of the act oct of or 19 1913 1003 VJ Tho The supreme su su- supreme preme court however took tool the view that the tho intention of or th the Ic legislature when It passed tho the act net of or 1903 was to fix the 00 salaries of or the tho jud judges s es without allowing mileage and expenses e T The e application was d dismissed hm |