Show T HOWELL DENIES i S STORY STOB S S of Testimony in Contempt Proceedings S Against Standard CASE CA E UNDER ADVISEMENT lIItle c Hears lIeal's All 11 li B Unfair Fakes In In- 5 5 ul e in Court r Mountain Inter Republican S Bureau th Street J S.- S. O Au Aug 22 The 22 The greater part y of the he lla day In Ju Judge c Iau 1 CO court It L was spent In iii the lie hearing of the contempt con con- 5 tempt tempt proceedings against the Stand 4 ard anI Publishing company William Y Glassmann and Frank II I. I Francis arising avis alls i- i ing ot out of certain alleged libelous articles ar nr- ar- ar tides which appeared ll in the StandS Standard Stand Stand- S ard atti during the trial of oC Councilman wllliam Craig for misappropriation of the city's funds S As soon SOOIl as ns the caso case was called for forT T hearing this morning Attorn Attorney Farns- Farns arnsworth f S S worth for Cor the defendant t move moved for fora fori i a dismissal of the suit on the grounds t. t that there was no flO cause for action This matter mattel was vas argued during the time S.- S. entire forenoon and was overruled o I At time the tIl session tes lon the defendants de de- contended cl that Ul the ho articles complained of we were 1 not Intended to Lo S apply In the Cral Craig case a e but to the lie lieS S Chambers case that further they were intended to n reply to c certain certa n ar- ar ticks which appeared In the Salt Lake 5 S Tribune which the he defendant coinS company com coin unfair S lan pany alleges were Gla on oil Stand t I p 21 1 Almost before the closing of th the court and ami before the completion fI ni iii nithe 5 the tIme trial lal Mr rr Glassmann was called ll i S 5 to the stand lanel and in tile the course of oC the thle e by hl his attorney testified entItled th that before Its publication lm Ill he personally per per- i had shown to Judge Howell j the tho article foi for which contempt of or 5 court Is alleged with a view of or ob- ob I r t S taming the courts court's opinion as IlS to toS S whether 1 the time article ml might ht be so conr construed con con- I r S as nfl being in Iii contempt GlasS Glas- Glas tet tilled entitled that JUll Judge e eri ri S Howell had all advised him that hat he did ti S not miot consider I the article in contempt tt Judge c i Judge c howell was vas then called to the 5 5 5 stand and made a strenuous denial dental of w k ever CI having ha seen seln the lie article In ques S tion He lie admitted that an article r. r writ written tell by 3 Attorney Farnsworth J queS-j queS of or ofa a 1 numerous nature HIl and bearing barIn O oh on l f. f S all flu of the councilman cases in ili general 1 had been heen hown him hini lint hut stated that lint 5 he lie had bad never el seen the article regardS regard regard- S lug Jn the lie Craig Crall case cane ca c. c AVI Uh Hi the lie closing clusin of oC the time Introduction t j of testimony Judge Ju 1 c raughn j look tonk the tho nd I advisement and It U la Is not tt J Ui t H 3 UJ r I 1 k J i th I I t O i fc lie tho attorneys YS tor tal or hot both h lid t-lid lj n S. S t el to present o ot of ee 1 S 'S |