Show UNIFORM 1 DIVORCE fORM IS ADOPTED i Delegates tes to National Congress Take Important Action r NEW EW YORKERS DONT DON'T VOTE VOT I r I of E cr Other Sta Sa cs Every I f r 7 r CHI JO Give Gl Their Sanction to f S I Plan of v r I 4 t I Philadelphia Nov O ib 14 With With t t sanction sancton of oC every state slat represented New e York Yoi-k the time delegates to tl National Congress on Uniform or Dl DIor f fLaws Laws which closed d Its Is sessions I in uil this J t city tonight adopted a form of uniform uns- uns un- un form Corm divorce which Is i to be reco men mended ed to the different legislatures e Isla of tho the states for passage The fhe sanction sanc sanc- nc- nc tion lon of ot of Now New c York was withheld b boV bo- cause the proposed new statute cause more causes tot for divorce than the one statutory cause cause cus recognized lit la in laNew New ew York that York that of oC adultery That New York v abstain voting was announced late this afternoon after after- noon b by Charles Thaddeus Thaddcus Torr Terry secretary see see- of or the lie Now New ew York delegation He said his colleague 11 Mr Huffcut Hufcut ha had been a member of or tho the committee on resolutions which had presented to the congress the act and In iii view vie of oJ that fact he as assumed med that the vote vote- of ot New Ne York would have been a a 0 tc tie Mr Ir Huffcut was absent unavoidably and amid under those circumstances he ho an an- an that New ew York would would- not flot cast a vote ote In explaining hl his attitude after ater th tho con congress re adjourned Mr Ir Terry lerry said ald that h his Is own personal convictions would have Impelled him to vote no noon on the question of or the approval a of tho the I queston proposed statute but that thal h he thought t tit It but due lue to his absent col colleague to t I consider r tho the matter mater a a. tie te and refrain retraIn l from casting the states state's Vote He Re declared de tie- de dared cared that he had no objection to any of or the provisions of or the proposed ed statute except that one which allowed d I divorce for other e causes than the one already sanctioned by New Ne York legis- legis I laton latton Bishop US l Donut Makes Address Bishop William Q I J Albany Abany who tho thoat ll f at ut Its It eon conclusion luston said He waiT wal a that the tha action at of the con congress r s In up ap- ap l jire P m O t n u Jl o p tt J r. r I meaning meaning- me except j ept t th tho coil I gross Kress gless recognized that oth other othet l causes were really realy recognized In lii If the existing legislation of or CarioUs states Ho He Ic said sahi sid that lint h he was that the congress had bad been boen In session eslon at Philadelphia animated b by the sm same spirit which had led let the delegates when the they met a at at Washington to declare that the they were opposed ed to the Increase of or l' l recognized causes for tor divorce in states where but lt butone butone one was now In existence In addition additon to the proposed statute regulating the granting n of divorcee 11 two to other acts were ed to lo lothe the legislature of at the time several stats states for passage one relating to tho the collo col- col lo tion of ot statistics on the divorce tuston question and anti the other relating In t similar statistics legar regarding the Issuance ance anee of or marriage licenses A 1 radical to forbid the lie solicitation Ir i r f divorce business b by lawyers Jawer under under- penalty of or line and autti nd Imprisonment Ol on- on L unexpected opposition ane and was wa finally withdrawn The he rea reason reason or r f- f fi tim n i the withdrawal was the o objection ni vi e among others by Vice ce han han- an r- r HIT Emery EmelY of or 1 Now ow Jersey wh wild who tie de- ilar d th that t the proposed act was ms too hurtle and would forbid Corble a n lawyer fn e en e undertaking ng- ng to take tak up tip the case cSt of if r f a friend he knew knott was contemplating b ri divorce proceedings In withdrawing wIh with with- da drawing wing the bill bI Walter Waiter aler George Georgo Smith of Penns Pennsylvania J said si he was unwilling either to lo have the bill bf passed I when such Important grounds of or ob objection ob- ob it In I s l jeton lection were brought against i fl present form brat or 01 to have havo It voted down when w the Ito general gener principle could not not bt bp be approved by b the congress Werner Lo Io Loses cs c Ills His Poin Point Delegate Werner Verner of oC Missouri re renewed ye- ye towed without success a light which I lib he ha had already alread vainly made in committee om- om com to have havo Inserted In lii tho the statute n a a. section making mal it i incumbent on a judge ludge trying a suit stilt for divorce to turn turn- over ver to the criminal authorities for fot prosecution the evidence of or any crime Dr ur misdemeanor committed by the de defendant tie tie- Q- Q which might be brou brought ht out In ml the divorce orco proceedings proceedings so that the ike defendant might be prosecuted after aftel the divorce granted for fot the crime or misdemeanor committed leading up P to divorce the he Pleading for a 0 change In a section of oC r the proposed e statute of or uniform divorce laws aws which she declared work great Injustice to her sI se Re Rev Caroline Carolne Bartlett Bartet Crane of or Kalamazoo Kala- Kala Iala mazoo Mich lucId held the time attention of ot the ho delegates for a long line today The She Introduced an amendment which mould give he to lo women greater reater opportunity unity of ot securing freedom from tho the cruc and the indignities of or bru husbands and amud precipitated the most spirited debate of the day da Paragraph six decrees that a a divorce be granted to an Injured hus lutt huS or 01 wife vIe who have moved mo to an an- othol state on only I when whon the alleged ance Is recognized as a n sufficient ground for divorce In St the state In In which the offense was wag wa committed Mrs Crane declared that her sox sax 80 suffer Injustice from this provIsion provision pro pro- I vision because some states recognize so su o few Cew causes cuse for for divorce The chief objection to lo Air Mrs MI Cros Cranes Crane's was that It I would discriminate in f favor lor of or the wife I 1 dont don't want favors for I my se sex Mrs Irs Crane declared This amendment amend ml font ment nt is just just The Tho amendment trait waa lost |