Show C CLAIM DI ii- ii OltI OHU FALSIFIED P. f S. S i. i J 1 r. r Fell A L s k-s That City It Commit Ind V Ik Ut Set Aside ill Alleging falsi falsifying of or the time cU city court records through which a fraudulent t nt was WaR LS entered against t him S S. S J J. J l Fell ii thou filed an aim action In time the district court yesterday la asking for fOI a restraining restrain ing ort order r aga against mist time the American cun Mer- Mer cantH X Hp Reporting agency According to tn the complaint Fell Foil wan nN served sl with u munitions In Inti in Ito Ito- tion tiomi Instituted against him b by tho time I present defendant on July 1 1005 1905 the time summons purporting to tn have ha been issued IS- IS sued iuNI from the tue elt city court COUlt courtOn courtOn On Jul July 7 7 i. 1905 the plaintiff al alleges alleges al- al I lieges leges i he called at the time office of tile the I cl clerk rk of the time city court and arid a asked l ed that hat he he be given gl a a. CO copy of the time complaint im In the ca case e. e The clerk replied he al alleges alleges al- al Il leges es that no imo action had imad been filed flied I leave athe the He lie Hea a t-ai t compelled to a the plaintiff further urther alleges July 7 I 1903 1905 and did not return until about October 20 0 O tile the same Mme year ar On hl his re return return re- re turn he lie was no d I that a Judgment had imad 1 been entered against t him by hy sic do- fault In the sum surn of or He Ufo thereupon went to tho the clerk of or orthe the time city court a as did I hl his hc claims u to see the complaint Ian I an and l looked through th time the flies but hut no complaint could IJ be found oun i Later Latel he alleges the complaint was 1 found had and was waN marked as as having ln been I flied filed July 7 7 1005 1905 The Time plaintiff now nov alleges that thai th the endorsement was wal fraudulently and antI wrongfully made madu and that the complaint complain was filed d af after dr- dr tem ter t I th the date named He further alleges that lm h he ha had l a a good aH and meritorious defense e in the tile action but that the action tal taken n prevented pro pre lle vented him from rota as asserting rt ng and i pro protecting 1110 hi imis rl rights anti and mal making ft a de 11 fen He therefore asks that flint the time judgment judg judg- ment be declared l oi void and that an order be issued against th the defendants I restraining resti them ft Ct om cia enforcing it H. |