OCR Text |
Show TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT... BY JIM STILES ® THE CONTRADICTIONS OF OUR LIVES This issue has been in the works since last summer. As a gnawing dull pain in the back of my conscience, it’s been around for years. I suspect that anyone who lives here and makes a living here, and actually thinks from time to time, knows the kind of ache I refer to. We live in one of the most beautiful places on Earth. Many of mouth ran off the BIG ADs like McDonald’s and nae King. I’ve never had to worry about conflicts of conscience on a grand - scale. I never refused their ads-my own editorial expressions kept them away in the first place. But the contradictions linger. My pal Joe Kingsley, who is currently mad at me again because of the "Moab’s Beloved Junk" us moved to Moab years ago, or decades ago, against the advice issue, told me I’m a hypocrite because I complain about tourism and approval of our friends and elders who said, "How in the hell are you going to make a living out there in the middle of that desert? Pretty sunsets don’t pay the rent, boy!” But we moved here anyway, took our chances, downsized our expectations of material wealth, and took pleasure in those precious intangible assets that many others failed to see. Now we sit in a new century, and my friends and J are part of the Moab Establishment. We own homes, businesses, some have families, and almost all of us are connected, in some way, to the very same tourist economy that we've also come to loathe. It is a strange and troubling contradiction. A love-hate relationship that often tears away at the very principles and values we hold most dear. We came here 20 years ago, and then make money off tourist-based companies. What can I say? He’s right. My policy has always been that _ anybody can advertise, but that none of them should expect me to alter an opinion to appease them. “It’s not like I’m holding a gun to their heads,"I told Joe. "If they don’t like The Zephyr, they can get out." So he did. But it certainly doesn’t absolve me. For example, I despise embarrassingly self-righteous and blinded by the black and white simplicity of idealistic youth. We came here to save the canyon country. We in the environmental community essentially declared war on the traditional abuses of public land--grazing, logging, mining-the extractive industries that have honestly wreaked havoc on the red rock country for a century. There were so few of us here then, just a handful by today’s standards, that our own impacts on the land--our non-motorized recreational activities--didn’t worry any of us. But it should have. We should have seen what was coming and we didn’t. We were simply the vanguard of a staggering demographic shift and a cultural and recreational revolution. Our hip little Moab Minority helped pave the way for what has happened since. Across the West there are other Hip Minorities who did the same for other small towns in what we now call the New West. In 1950, the ee pulened of all the western states, save California, was 17 million. By 2000 the number had jumped to more than 50 million. The population of the U.S is projected by some to reach 400 million by the middle of this century and the growth will not be equally distributed. Indeed, the New West sits guide books--I think they’re ruining some of the last best “secret places" in SE Utah. Yet half my advertisers must sell some kind of a guidebook. And without exception the businesses that sell the books are good people contradictions are excruciating. defense is that we came here to that most of us don’t want to grow beyond recognition, even trying. to make a living. The All many of us can say in our make a living, not a killing, and see this community completely if it means we drive the same car for a decade and eat beans in the winter. We try to do the best we can and hope we can live with our own consciences. So what happens next? There is a dangerous contradiction just waiting to be exploited when someone suggests that the drawbridge to the town needs to be raised, now that we’re on the right side of it. But the truth is, if 20,000 potential immigrants look at our town of 9000, and they all decide to move here, it won't be a little town of 9000 anymore will it? Maybe some of us will have to leave, in order to make room for others. But one thing is certain. Environmentalists can no longer ignore the invasion around us and pretend it’s still 1975. The times have changed and the culture has changed. "Wilderness" is still just as important as it ever was, but saving this land is so much more than that. One of my friends put it best: "When the population of Utah grows so much and changes so much that its Senators actually want a big wilderness bill, it’ll only be because we yuppies moved in and took over the state..and that’s when I'd have to leave." Isn‘t that weird? And I’d be right behind him. on the verge of an explosive change that is almost beyond our comprehension and we must deal with it. We don't go into the wilderness to exhibit our skills at gourmet cooking. We go into the wilderness to get away from people who think gourmet cooking is important Elucrd Abbey To me, we environmentalists have failed to come to terms with the changes and grim promise of a very crowded future. We must be willing to come forth and say: WE ARE PART OF THE ' PROBLEM. Recently an editorial in the Salt Lake Tribune suggested that, ",..while they (environmentalists) were battling the cattle ranchers, oil drillers and loggers, they overlooked another threat that can wipe out an area’s wild character as effectively as a clear-cut: Themselves." To me, it at least offered an opportunity for some honest soulsearching. But the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance’s response was, to me, discouraging. "While we agree that all of us have an impact on the land," SUWA’s newsletter replied, "the difference between hiking and clear-cutting is profound. Implying otherwise suggests deep-seated, dogmatic opposition to the efforts of environmentalists.” From dogmatic to disingenuous. Of course, we all know the difference between a clear-cut and a footprint. But how about a billion footprints? Or ten billion? How about well-intentioned, self-proclaimed environmentalists moving by the millions into the ever-dwindling habitat of the ever-encroached wildlife? How about the exploitation of wildlands by a whole spectrum of nonmotorized recreational entrepreneurs who can gain absolution from environmental groups by making a generous donation or by paying lip service support to a particular piece of environmental legislation? Or how about a funky little bi-monthly publication that complains about all these abuses and yet survives on the advertising revenues of some of those very same companies? My own contradictions are enough to give me insomnia. On the one hand, I feel relieved in a way thatyears ago, my own big KUER has lost its mind As long as we're on the topic of human error and confession, I'd like to encourage the management of KUER-FM in Salt Lake City to come clean, admit they've made a horrendous mistake and return Gene Pack and classical music to the airwaves. On March 16, Utah’s public radio station suddenly and without warning, terminated classical music from its format and ended the on-air 42 year career of Gene Pack. According to reports in the Salt Lake Tribune, Mr. Pack was given 48 hours notice. WHAT WERE YOU GUYS THINKING? Even for a news junkie like myself, 1 can only take so much grim information. After surviving "Morning Edition," I found the music and Gene’s comforting voice a welcome respite from Reality, even as I grimly went about my own business, dealing with the news in SE Utah. lm not a classical music buff; in fact, I’m pretty damn classically-ignorant, but the music and Gene Pack were a vital part of my day. Familiar friends. PLEASE, KUER...Bring back Gene. He is “what you do best." THAT GOOFY LETTER FROM THE ’FIENDS’ The day after I left Moab for Australia, the very day fee T left, almost all of my advertisers received an unsigned letter with the title, "A Letter from Friends of The Zephyr.” Its anonymous authors had a very strange way of expressing their deep affection for me. (If you'd like to read the ‘Letter,’ it’s on the web site, in the archives section, in the December 2000/January 2001 issue). The letter was, in reality, an ill-conceived, poorly written attempt to misrepresent the opinions and philosophy expressed in this publication, and, by doing so, its unknown authors hoped to seriously damage The Zephyr's advertising base. Didn’t work. And good grief, these knuckleheads couldn’t even spell my name correctly. For future reference, it’s "St-I-les, |