| OCR Text |
Show PBOVO CITV, UTAH, FIIIDAIl, SEPTEMBER 12, 1S90. VOL. 1. ShoFtfs, M. D., vs. ' epptal; Thurman Wbitecntton. PHYSCIAN J1HD SURGEON, Iayson, Utah. CIVIL Offloe a.t Residenos, Milliner store For the September Term of mill ovrr M. I). Simon's Attends a calls day or uitfit. tlie U. 8. Court at Provo. 101. Sarah D Gorley vs John 51. Silas Ileed vs George Pearson et & G A Bennett & & King; Saxey Sutherland; ley; divorce; Thurman & King. al; equity; James McClellan; 1 Bradley. 52. Gabriel Iluntsmim vs Fillmore City; equity; S It Thurman and George Sutherland; Slieeks A Rawlings and W I II King. 53. Anna Wliatcott vJ Alfred Wliat- cdtt, divorce; A Saxey; LrEvans. 54. Bullion, Beck A Cjiampion Mir ing Co. vs F K Morris; equity; Arthur Brown; Bennett A Bradley. Bullion, Beck A Cliampion Mining Co. vs F K Morris; equity; Arthur Brown: Bennett A Bradley. 50. F. Iv. Morris vs. Bullion, Beck A Cal. Mining Co.; equity; Bennett A Bradley; Arthur Brown. 57. Louis Boukofsky vs. John Green; equity; W. J. ' Snyder; ; Bennett A Bradley. 58. George Munroe vs. Margaret Monroe; divorce; J. S. Giles; W II ? King. 50. II B Clawson vs F K Morris; equity; Arthur Brown; . Bennett A Bradley. (SO. Valentine !, Thomas vs F K Morris; equity; Arthur Brown; Bennett A Bradley. C A LEND A 11. 1 united states vs. IT. Smith et al. law: u. s. Attorney; S. II. Thurman; & Geo. Sutherland. 2. u. s. vs. Jos. Page et al.; u. f.. G. W. SHORES. Attorney; Jacob Johnson. CRIMINAL CASKS. BLOCK AND lx 8 u. s. Page et al.; u. s. Attorney; Smoot & Co.s JMii'ti Okkicij Johnson. Jacob Stuise. 4 u. s. vs. Jolin W. Shepheard et Ics. 1 blk east of Robert.- - House. A liwng 1,11 oriinportuntrauM'M al.; u s. Attorney; Henry Adams & Jacob Johnson. fo be Tried. a. U. S. vs. 3. M. Williams etal.; tr. s. MYTON, Tlie following canes are set for hearWm. K. lleid. ing at the September term of the Dis- Attorney; ATTORNEY-AT-LAs 7. S. M. Williams et al.; u. vs. 0. trict Court l in lrovo: s. Attorney; Wm. K. Reid. UNITED STATES Cl! I. INAL CASES. 7. u. s. vs. Emfiaa J. Clark et al.; u. & s. Attorney; M. M. Kellogg. 1. U. S. vs. William 11. May; unlawAgency. 8. U. S. vs. E. W. Fox et al.; u. s. ful cohabitation; U. S. Attorney; r Store Over Bines Erno; Attorney; lacob Johnson. Thurman & King. it. r. s. vs. G. A. Murdock; ir. 2. U. S. vs. W. Christensen; misL7 P.?.OVO S. U. set Attorney. for trial demeanor; Attorney; 10. i'. s. vs. G. A. Murdock et ah; u September 27th R. 3. U. S. vs. George Gee; unlawful s. Attorney. 11. George Sutherland, adminstrator cohabitation; United Stales Attorney; Thurman & King. of estate of James Robbins, vs. Don C. 4'U. S. vs. John C. Graham: unlaw- Sagers; George Sutherland. SALT LAKE ITV asi IMIO VO, UTAH, ful cohabitation: 12. II. Woodruff vs. C. Lyons; apU. S. Attorney; & Thurman King. peal; S. W. Darke, A. G. Sutherland Salt Lale otfice Hooper & Elrce 5 U. !S. vs. J. D. Page; misdemeanor; 13. AnnaMarksvs. JnlinT. Sullivan ! U. S. Attorney; Jacob Joliusoa; office at the Asylum- et al.; Evans, Varian. Sutherland and IS U. S. vs. H. W. Fox; misdemeanor; ' Tlmrimm; J. G. Sutherland and . K. Jaeob .lolinson; set Arthur Brown, J. It. McBride and 1). Attorney; F. F. for trial 27t !i. L. Dana. T. U. S. s. Casper Christensen; If, Loiviizo Hatch vs. P. Erickson; misdemeanor; U. S. Attorney set for appeiT; S. It. Thurman and Geo. ; trail September 27th lloge A Burmester. B3!i!i Dr. N 5-- WM. S. W lii-li- Fire Collection, Life Insurance 1 t KLETTING, Architect Boilitinx, 10, UTAH. W. I St. WIIITWOTTOK. Saxey & Whitecotton, Attorneys and Counselors at Law. Rooms 11 & 12r stairs oyer Bank Billing, Dp Provo City T7ta.li. , - McliFFERTY RAWLINGS NSORIAL PARLOR OPPOSITE T tahkrxaclk .(' I.ASS TOl'KUIll.tL s e.m ri.o v i:. KCT WORK 0llRA3TKK1. j ! Sidht-rl.iiid- 8. LT. S. vs. meiiMor; U. S. J. I, Iea.'ock; - inisdi- Attorney W. Iv. lieid; set for tri.il September 27th. I). U. S. vs. Xiclmlus II. Groesbeck: Tliiirman A iduUerj1 l. S. Attorm-y- ; King. 10 I". S. vs. William Backer; unlawful cnhabital ion; LT. S. Attorney; Thurman A King. 11. U. S. vs. William Backer; ndult-etU. S. Attorney Thurinuii A King. 12. U. S. vs. Pleasant S. Bradford; unlawful cohabitation; U. S. Attorney. 1:. U. S. vs. George Slagg; unlawful cohabitation U. S. Attorney. 1J.U. S. vs. Peter Oaleberry; adultery; U. S. Attorney; Thurman A King. U. S. vs. C. A. A. Christensen; unlawful cohabitation; U. S. Attorney, Tlmrmali A King. v: 1M. King. 17. U. S. vs. Mahowie Bishop; adull-erU. S. Atturnev; Thurman A v; I. S' vs. William IT. Ashby; A S. V. Thurman adultery; Attorney; i set 17th trail for King; September is. U. S. vs. II. B. Bennett; adulContractors and Builders. tery: l S. Attorney; Thurman A Estimates Given Flans Furnished King 1!) U. . vs. Hiram Dnwsnip; adulvTortc tery; U. S. Attorney; Thurman A ciorjes All Otar King. t o Coiif fvic-- t 20. u. s. vs. Beason Lewis; unlawful cohabitation; ?. Attorney; l voi:k patronage solicited i Thurman A King 113 ?l! Ihi! Slrcel, 21. l'. s. vs. Thomas Featherstone; PP-OVunlaw ful cohabitation; u. s. Attorney; Thurman A King; set for September D. D. S. D. La.ZELLE WBLLICK Bonaldson 9 awonbiir ; -. X- C in- serted without plate. Worthless broken or carious tect'h need not to he extracted, Gold and Porcelain crowns are ainployed in their place (Durable ami natural appearing Gold and vuleanitc dentures when desered.) All operations suceptablo to the dental profession performed, and guaranteed satisfactory. A. 31. OrfitC hours l.:H)6.:iLP- - 31. u 912 Room 13 Union Block. A CLARK, Licensed Abstractors of Titles X AMI 10 R UTAH CO. Office 1st National Bank Provo City, Building, TJta.Ii Our Abitract how all Errors and filings against real property to any part of Utah County. HARRISON HOUSEI U.VCLK SAM'S RESTAURANT. One ami a half J. st. lnovft. blocks I'll. m Depot. Hot Jointa from IZ to Z. 170 S. Meals 25 cts. K IT C II X : fo -criiil. it in Mbc 1'oi'rc-c: KXGLI-- G 2C jrovo Saml Thurgood, fiiii.M SI per Wsty, breakfast at 0 a. in., Varian et al. vs. Centen-nial-Eure- ka 33-Th- e Prop. i. tu lt-- v Springville vs. David Fordonski; appeal; Thurman A King; Saxey A WhilecoUon. 12. Springville vs. David Fordonski; appeal; Thurman A King; Saxey A Whiteeolton. 13. Mt. Pleasant vs. Gustav Johnson; appeal; Jacob Johnsoq, (Tcq. Sutherland. 14. Springville vs. James F. McClellan; appeal; Thurman A King; Saxey A Whitecotton. lo. Springville vs. James McCellan; appeal; Thurman A King; Saxey A Whitecotton. 11 i:x;laxi. ler Mok. Dinner 12 to 2 m., sharp supper ill 6 27. C. S. Mining Co.: C. S. Varian; Bennett A Bradley. 22. i:. s. vs. William Southwick; 28. II. W. Davies et al. vs. Ed. unlawful cohabiltalion; u. s. Hines. Thurniaii A King: set for Sep 20. Jared W. lloundy vs. M. E. tember HUh Crandall et al.; Sutherland A Judd; 2.i. u. s. vs. Peter K. Lemon; unThunnan A King. lawful cohabitation; u. s. Attorney; 81). Michael I,. Powers vs. J. S. Tliiisniaii A King; set for September Walts; appeal; for defendant, J, S. lotli Giles. 24. u. s. vs. George II. I Tales 37. Lois Clark vs. Henry Xebeker; unlawful cohabitation; u. s. Attorney; appeal; D. S. I)ahii; S. I,. Page. Thurman A King. 82 Mammoth Mining Co. vs. Matth2o. u. s. vs. (ieorge'H. Hales; polyew Condon; iDnnett A Bradley; gamy; u. . Attorney; Thurman A Frank Hoffman. King. History Co. vs. S. C. Ewing; M. M. Kellogg; Arthur llrowu. TKilltlTOKIAL ClllMIXAL CALENDAR. Charles Olsen vs. Melvin Smith; 1. The People vs. Geo. W. Hancock appear. ct al.; murder; Samuel Cox vs. The Genuine Thurman A Co.; George Sutherland; Benmining 2 The People vs. Jas. Chadwick et nett A Bradley. ah; grand laicency; District Attorney; 36. Wm. II. Patton vs Ell Openhorn Geo. Sutherland. ul.; M- - M. Kellogg; Thunnan A Kiug. 3 The People vs. Jas. Chadwick ct 37. Unrted States vs. J.Jj. Peacock al.; grand larcency; District Attorney; etal.; US attorney; Wm. K.Beid. Gen. Sutherland; set for trial Sept. 38. Mary A. v, Charles House: Saxey 27111. A Whitecotton. 4. The People vs. Neils Xeilsen; ap30. Wm. II, Liter vs. .Ozokerite MinBootli A peal; District Attorney; ing Co. Wilson; set for Sept. 20th. 4(1. Bobevt F. Boss vs. Christie Lee; o. The People vs. Win. Breck; appeal; D. Evans. murder; District Attorney; Arthur 41. A. E. Merrlam vs. Sam Ilete Val- Brown: set for Sept. 22nd. 11. II. Co.; V. K. Reid; P. L. (J. The People vs. John Ilunafeir; appeal; District Attorney; set for 42. Neils L. Eliuson vs. Henrr F. Sept. 20th. Dunials etal.; Wm. Zvbriskiu; W'm.K, 7. The People vs. Win. U. May; Reid appieal; District attorney; Saxey A 43. Ilyrain Burdin etal. vs. Michael Whitecotton. Ilolhivain: George Sutherland; J. J. 8. Fillmore City vs. Gabriel HuntsRogers. A man; appeal W. II. King; Thiirm-.41. F. A. Russell vs. John Sulivau, Sutherland. constable of Tjnt.o precinct; Stephens 0. Alpine City vs. Clmster Pa hlo 'k; Sehiioder; J. S. Watts and C. L. Brown appeal; S. 11. Thurman; A Saxoy. '45. Anna Marks vs. W. II. Culmer 10 City of Bichiirhl vs. William et al.; Varian, Evans, Sutherland and Clark; appeal; for dcferideiil. A Sax- Tnurmant' M. 0. Sutherlaiul and ey. ALT. ARE WELCOMED. oxfonit, l. 3-- over Ifathcnhrooks Store. HAYESCAHP Sutherland. li. John 1). Milner vs. Provo City; J. E. Bootli and John B. Milner; Thurman A King and George Slither land. 17. Provo City vs. J. C. York; appeal; S. It. Thurman; John B. Milner. 18. Alvin L. Jiobinson vs. Hans Esklund; Thurman A King and Geo. Sutherland; J. L. Giles. 10. IlerberL Bate et al. vs. American Fork City; Thurman A King and Geo. Sutherland and J. E. Sutherland; W. II. Dickson and D. Evans. 20. B. B. Steele vs. T. L. Holey et al.; A. Saxey; (too. Sutherland. 21. Ephraim Xasli vs. Schofield Bros.; Thurman A King Hnd Geo. Sutherland; Jacob Johnson, Arthur Brown and Henry Adams. 22. Provo Co op. Institution vs. St. Y. Le Sieur; Thurman A King and Geo. Sutherland; O. W. Powers. 2J. Kate McXeal vs. JJ. W. Driggs, Jr., et al.; Frank Pierce and Welles Whittemore: W. II. Dickson. 24 Smith Ehringer et al. vs. Anchor Mining Co.; J. McBride; Bennett A Bradley. . Ira C. Kenneliy vs. Anchor Mining Co.; W. C. Hall; Bennett A Bradley. 26. James M. Kenneliy vs. Anchor Mining Co.; .W. C. Hall; Bennett A Bradley. At-ttorue- y; Tooth Extracted ami filled with- Partial or full sets of teeth W. S. McCornick vs. Win. (Mark A King and George l!'tli dentist. out pain. . et al.; Thurman p Gootl Logic. Tli. fact tliat rliiMiinatisiii Is caused by a morbid condition of Use blond, csirtniiis Uie success of Hood's Sarsaparilla In curing this disease. Hood's Siirsaj'aril.a t.vorcouws or heulralizcs tlie acidity of t!io Mowl. restore the vital fluid to a licaliliy condition, aud ads beneficially uion the heart, liver and kidneys. Those who suffer the pains and aclics of rlico piatism should try Hood's Sarsaparilla. W'il-liiim- -'. Arthur Hruwii Rio. Grand W. R. Co. vs Andrew Miideii et al Bennett, Marsha ..and Bradley. 47. Tliom.is Jarinuin vs D A R G IV Ry Co; M M Kellogg and W N My ton. 4S. Hyriuq V Jones vs J W Stewart et ill; Saxey A Whitecotton; Thurmai A King. 4!). United Stales vs L A Scott Elliott; equity; U S Attorney; Tluinnau A King 5. Charles Crane xsBIVutts'ct ul; equity; I Evans and S It Thurman; ' George Sutherland. 46. . skptemiier 19. SEPTEMBER 25. United States vs. Charles A. Terry. The People vs. F. S. Wright et al. United States vs. Susan Bench. Tlie People vs. Roy Alexander. United States vs. Charles Vincent. Tlie People vs. Kobt. Brooke et aL The People vs. Elizabeth Murphy et al. Tlie People vs. Juo. Mickel et al. United States vs. Joseph Dillwortli. Tlie People vs. Walter Mattews. United States vs. II. Jenkins, Sr. United States vs. Frank G. Wall. United States vs. L. B. Miller. United States vs. Jacob Xeilson. septemiikh 22. 26. SKFTKMUEU Tlie People vs. Charles Boyer at. al. Tlie leople vs. Soren Jensen. The People vs. Ilarway Edwards et al. Tlie leoiile vs. Ted Burkdell. Tlie People vs. S. F. Monut. Tlie leojile vs. Henry Crouse. The People vs. Jos. Fairbanks. SKFTEM11ER 23. Tlie leople vs. John Parman. The People vs. Janies Garbett at al. SEPTEMBER 27. Tlie People vs. William II. Gibson. vs. Andrew Uendricksen. United States The People vs. Wm. Goodwin. vs. John C. llarjvr. United States The People vs. Wm. Smith. vs. The F. II. Boyer. leople Tlie People vs. Benj. Forman. vs. Tlie Frank Dinne. leople Tlie People vs. Wm. Davis. The leople vs. Jas. II. Vallis. SEPTEMBER 24. Tlie People vs Tlie People vs. Jos E Crook.. The People vs. 1 12. Mary M Ciiislett vs James Chia-iet- t; The People vs. divorce; Thunnan A King; Booth Tlie People vs. A Wilson. SEPTEMBER 29. II. C. Crosbie. M. C. Weiner. Juo Hickman. Tlie leople vs. Caml Amlei'son. Tlie leople vs. J. P. Kelley. United States vs. Jos. Garlick. United States vs. Henry Mower. United States vs. Jas. A. Taylor. Jas Ilulse et al. Solin Pierce. LAW -- U highest of all in Leavening Powo Govt Report, Aug. xj, 1889. 3. s REED, ecobSo. Wm Brock vs Viola Brock; di- voice; I J Maccabe. 103. Charlotte Oldfield vs Alfred Oldfield; divorce; Booth & Wilson. 104. Thomas Wright, Jr, adminis- trator, vs Jos F Wright et al; equity; Sutherland A Judd; Marshall & Boyle. 105. R Danger et al vs St V LeSieur; equity; M M Kellogg; Arthur Brown. 106. Joseph Bate, administrator, vs Peter Bell; equity; D D Iloutz; Booth A Wilson. 107. Wm R May vs Xeplii Irrigation Co; equity; Saxey A Whitecotton. 108. R M Rogers vs Daniel Cook et al; equity; Saxey A Whitecotton; Geo Sutherland. 109. P C Anderson et al vs Neils L Eliasou at al; equity; Wm K Reid 110. Thomas W Simper vs George Brown et al; equity; Wm W K Reid. 111. Maria Woolcock vs Joseph Wonlcock; divorce; M M Kellogg and AND MOTION CALENDAR. John Elliott vs John lUastian et 1. Reuben P. Miller et. al. vs. Ilairam al.; equity; Baskin A Van Horne; Willson et. al.: motion to retax costs; Arthur Brown and E B Critchlow. 02-.' Johannah f Evenreed-vIlaxs II. R. Watrous; David Evans. 2. Anna Marks et.. aL vs. W. II. Olson et al equity;.. William'. K Reid; William Za brisk ie. Cohner et. al.; motion to retax costs; (S3. Hubert I, Allen vs JiilfTT Martin; Varian, Evans, Sutherland and Thurequit: Ilali A , Marshall; Thin nun man. 8. Ilerliert Shaw vs. A. D. Ferron; Sutherland and King. o csident Dentist, E Gor- - 102. 01. C Block-Proy- XO. 26. 61. Spanish Fork ity it all vs St Y demurrer to complaint; Henry Adams; i,e Sieur; equity? A Saxey, Thurman lloge A Bunnesler. A King, and George Sutherland; W II 4. Wm. II. Rex vs. Frank A. Baker; Dickson. demuncr to complaint; lloge A BurSpanish Fork City et al Vs Mose mester; Thurman A King. B Gay et al equity; A Saxey, Thurman 5. Anna Marks vs. Belle Tompkins; A King and George Sutlierhuid; D motion for new trial; J. L. Rawlins; T Sutherland A Judd Evans. ; 6- 66. Christiana McLain vsj W J Martha Cook vs. M.-Crandall McLain equity; Saxey A Whitecotton; et. al.; motion for new trial; Suther-I ABSGLUTEUlf PURE (5-- J. SHORES 8 CO i.THE I M M Kellogg. 67. Mary J Yates vs divorce; 68. J S Watts. land A Judd; Thurman A King. 7. Springville vs. John S. Fullmer; mot'on for a new trial and to retax costs; Thurman A King and Geo. Sutherland. 8. Springville vs. Joseph S. Wing; motion to retax costs; Thurman A King and Geo. Sutherland; Booth & Wilson. 9. Springville Wm. M. Clyde; motion to retax costs; Thurman A King and Geo. Sutherland; Booth A Wilson. 10. Mary p., Yxuk- - vs; Theo- M. Sa-- 1 muelaon bt; al.; demurrer to Rnawer; Saxey A Whitecotton; Thurman A King. 11. Hans Pbulsen vs. Theo. M. Sa-- 1 muelson et. al.; demurrer to answer; Thunnan A Saxey A Whitecotton; James IA Yates; Anna Marks ys Dugahl equity; J L Rawlings; Saxey Mc-Murpl- iy; A Whitecotton. Mary Miller 1 vs Conrad .Miller; divorce; J S Watts. 70. Fanny V Mikesell vs Alfred S Mikesell: divorce; J S Giles;-Dana. ; 71. Dolores Cattle Co vb et al eqnjty; W. C. Hal.li.tJeo Sutherland. 72. Emma E Bunce vs Louis A Bunce; divorce; Jacob Johnson. 73. Mary O Yoik vs Tlieo M Samuel- son et al equity; Saxey A Whitecotton; Thurman A King. 74. Ilans Poulson ys Theo M Samueison et al equity; Saxey A Whitecotton; Thurman A King. 75. R W Krereton et al vs Theo M Samueison et al equity; Saxey A Whitecotton: Thurman A King. '6. Olive A Groesbeck vs Clias D Groesbeck; divorce; Saxey A White-cotto69. PhiiI ll ax-we- King. 12. Chester I. Paddox vs. Worthy Nash; demurrer to complaint; Saxey A Whitecotton; Geo. Sutherland. 13. W. S. McCornick vs. W. L. Dykes et. al.; demuner to complaint; Geo. Sutherland; P. Lochrie and Wm. Con- DRUCCDSTS, :OF: PAITSON, Every thing; I - ) Vt( Button Prices. PAINLESS CARR HARVEY, Oije poor iVorHi of Peal Pros Store. n. 9 Springville, Gorlinski et al equity: Bradley; S II Lewis. 84. David Kelt et al vs. Joseph et al; equity; Bennett A Bradley; S. II. Levis. 85. David Keith et al. vs. Joseph Gorlinski et al; squity; Bennett A Bradley; S H Lewis. 86. David Keith et al vs Josesh Gor linski et al; eiuity; Bennett A Bradley; S II Lewis. 87. John McCuchnie vs. Hanna 88. 90. - divoree; M M Kellogg. 01. gold EXAMINATION FREE. N. B. Note our (eastern) prices: 11 . Artificial Teeth 071 Rubber too e"r ) fro7Yj Or Calluloid, (upper OT s and Platina Alloy 'eeth Extracting Free Every Wednesdays Teeth extracted without pain by local anaesthetics or by the world renowned Boston Vegetable Vapor perfectly safe In every case. All work warranted iirst class. ; Me-Cachn- ie; Lund-quis- wrriiotrr JdctrcuetiTfg , . : GIVE US A CALL AND SAVE MONEY. . Karen Lundquist vs O N Dentistry. inserted on UOI.I), MILTER, PLAIT 8UM, CKI.LL'IA)in or KLHHEK plates. PLATINI (bridge work). TEKTII 1IROKE3 A.T1I DEEAYEII TEE1TI ATD ROOl'H restored With AAM PORUEI.A1V CROWAM and made useful for many yean. Diseases of the Teeth and Gams Medically and Surgically treated. Irregularities of the teeth corrected ty the Positive system. lecbTitTig Taylor et al; equity; Hall Marshall; George Sutherland. 89. Mary Fowler vs Walter G Fowler; J S Watts. ARTIFICIAL TEKTII Amalgam, Silver or Cement divorce; D Evans. Cyrus II Spriggs vs. Teancuiu divorce; Utah. We are prepared to do all kinds of Operative and Mechanical Gold Gold Gor-lins- ki ) Courteous Treatment accorded to all. don. Co-o- p. 14. Fail-vieMer. Institute vs. North American Asphalt Co.; de77. Salina Creek Irrigation Co vs murrer to complaint; Booth, Wilson A Salina Stock Co et al equity; Jacob Wilson; Geo. Sutherland. 15. Caroline Daniels et. al. vs. Johnson; Bennett A Bradley. C. Beebee et. al.; demurrer 78. San Pete county vs Emery Co and J D Kilpack; equity: Jacob Jobn-so- n complaint; Booth Wilson A and W K Reid; Bennett, Marshall Thurman, King and Iloutz. 16. Springville vs. J. F. McClellan; A Bradley, to complaint; Thurman A demurrer 79. Hannah Fairbanks vs David B and Fairbanks: divorce; Evans King; Saxey A Whitecotton. 17. Sophia Johnson vs. Lars AnderRogers, SO. Jane E Ketcbum, demurrer to complaint; D. Evans; son; vs guardian, James Dunn, adminstrator; equity: J J. B. Milner. 18. William Carroll vs. Provo City; S Giles; Tburman A King. 81. David Keith et al vs Joseph demurrer to complaint; Geo. SutherGorlinski et al equity; Bennett A land; Thunnan A King. 19. J. W. Phillips vs. Frank Baker; Bradley; S II Lewis. to complaint; Hoge A Burdemurrer 82. David Keith et al vs Joseph in A King. Thurman ester; al et Gorlinski equity; Bennett A 20. et. aL vs. Michael Bardin S II Lewis, Ilynim Bradley; 83. David Keith et al va Joseph Ilolloran; demurrer to complaint; Geo. our line in t; N. B. Patients attended to at residence without, extra charge. . Stock, Produce or approved notes taken in payment Hanna Marker vs Peter Marker; - divorce; Wm K Reid. 92. Emily Ilindmarsh vs Ted Hind- - United States vs. Andrew Anderson, United States vs. James W. Stewart. marsh; divorce; J E Booth. United States vs. Neils IL Burristoq, Ann vs 93. Thomas Mayberry Mary United A Stater vs. Arthur CapipbeU, Wilson Bootli, Maybury; divoree; I vs J. R, . United States ... Wilsoin 94. I lenry P Jensen vb Johanot J en-- 1 United. Stages A. James Qymau, sen; divorce; Booth, Wilson A Wilson; Um( Swtea vs. A, M. Ikwnawv Sutherland A Judd. SEPTEMBER 18. 95. Anne C Nielsen vs Aiulcw P Nielson; divoree; Saxey A Whitecotton. United States vs. Cliristian Otteson. Unitid States vs. Lars Arnoldus. 96. (V)tlieiine M Stjander vb John United vs. Warren B. Smith, W Solander; divorce; Geo Sutlierland. United States va States Charles W, Rawlinsou. 97. Martha Ericksen vs Erick ErickSoten Michelsou, States vs, jUuited son; divoree; Tliurmau A King. United States va Hiram S. Crane. 98. Else S Arm ldsen vs liars Arnold'1. United, States vs, John Quaroberg. sen; divoree; Jacob Jtiluisou. iUnited States V. David Caudland. m. Springville vs. James Hawley; United States vs, John R. Baker, United States va. Charles D. SmitlL equity; S R Thurman, Suited States vs. Isaac Ilust. va al Jonah 100. tVi'A h Suffth et I A tymted States vs. J. Boddard. Thunnan Suthep lhillips; equity; I Vtitted States vs. Peter Anderson, A Wilson. Booth and; . I - - - for work. . MOUNTAIN DIVISION. New Time Card, June , 1890. 29," PASSENGER TRAINS LEAVE F. M. 45 J ucthf .2.25 Kcpliij loiiftf i A. M. and 460 628 560 2i47 1 roYO,. Lake Vriew, Pleasant-Grove,..-.- . A.I f. ii .4.25 and 7.45 ....(.ft 4.39 4A5 .6.05 8.01 8.11 8.21 .3.21 A24 American Fork, ; 6i8S Lehi,. i3i85 15 ' 8.85 Payson 7.00 Arriving at ) 8j57 Spanish Fork 10,1 1 4.11 u 7.15 Salt Lake City, f. Springville 'Trains leave Salt Lake at 7:10 a. m., and 8.50 p. m., leaving Jtovo at 9:40 a. m. awl 0:15 p. m. Trains leave Salt Lake for Ogden at 8:10 a. m., and C. F. RESSEGUiE, Gen. Manager. 5:00 p.m. 1.80 A 10.80 p. m. 8. Y ECCLES, Gen. Freight and Pass.' Agt., Salt Lake City. : ; SAQtftQuliif y . . ; . ...1 . . ' ' - ' : r I " |
