Show JUDGE RULING As the NEWS regards it there is but one thing to be said directly regarding judge barters hs decision in the mandamus decided on saturday it was in accordance acco with law lav anti anil therefore there was nothing alae for him co do the statute to ie quite plain on the subject and if tte tie applicant being otherwise qualified aud and having resided in the territory six months anthe and the precinct thirty days next preceding is refused registration our our condition would be a terrible gerrib to one indeed it tie lie could not obtain the right provided for him elsewhere eloe where and what other place but a court ot of equi equity tN the irbe advice of certain liberal extremists to register reaster if you have to go 90 with a gun guja would have something sumei hing like a of justification were the elnua otherwise than it is 0 ft the applicants showed that they had bad been X here considerably longer than the prescribed p time slid arid were not transients but residents albeit their domicile was waa and is a tent that of t some of the best beet men these theme valleys ever contained was wa it will be remembered ai also a tent lent it to is no reflection upon a man to live in such a shelter until he be own can obtain a better one ode on OD the contrary it to is oftener than otherwise an indication di of that hardihood and independent spirit so characteristic of the earlier settlers ot of every community and the objection that the tent was hot numbered to is the merest quibble altogether unworthy and properly an availing as it should have been even had the objection not been obviated the NEWS is not very much in love with itinerant v tera whatever their political inclination or by whatever name dome they way may be palled we hope all such will be thoroughly weeded out or r that those who are overlooked will be followed up and made to answer lor for the crime of sion annulling expressions of the peoples peopled will but because a residence bat baa been brief and the shelter occupied to is unsubstantial provided such residence to is the full term prescribed by law to is no do reason why any onela one should bould be excluded and it must musi not beso be so we ife peat judge barted decided properly prope on the showing made not only should the registrar be required to place the applicants applicant names on the rollf but buc being there the avro own era of them have a right to vote and haveth tir votes 01 stunted anted the same is be those of the ol 01 eat inhabitants in the midst of whatever degree of partisan ships it is manifestly dau dauger geroue Gue to rail st t the law or try to warp it to accomplish partisan partle xii code |