| Show THIRD DISTRICT COURT 11 r the th petit jurors for foi term GRINDING OUT I 1 bishop PHILLIPS AND 11 v sentenced at 10 9 alock this fla Iii orning the district court to sad judge ZanT made decisions in ahw the following 11 6 cases edward austin vs tribune ing company betiah to strike out parta answer overruled I 1 I 1 I 1 A C brixey vs Sou southern thirn ballway co demurrer 10 to coth plaint overruled ed gave notice that in the case bf A Vs va E degan I 1 the pA plaintiff lAtiff stands on second secona sila and loirro dou bounts ts without amendment and nd amends first and second counts THE PETIT were then called calle d and the examination by bt the district attorney resulted in inlaw the acceptance of alie the following st 84 charles bausom San soia salt L lake ak 3 city 12 george vV salt take lake city X Y J F lubeck park city I 1 I 1 E A williams joseph hobbs thoele tooele city 78 oliver eliter hodges salt lake city r i john mackay G granger A 11 louis S lake city 1 51 wai wm salt lake city aty 13 41 ww wm elarabi La rabi halt salt lake city D B stover stockton on 26 robert dye Salt Lake city isi J W udgere Bd Kerry salt luke lake city joseph park city osmond sat irl pleasant easan gleea lo 10 louis uis martin salt alt lake city bo 50 jameli ashman salt a it JR lake e city m A J la 88 robert 1 6 McEw mcewan alf salt lake city charles brown sandy 1 N B R penny Ping hain wm M H atwood south 46 mark spencer salt ake city 37 77 W H H U bowers salt lake city 13 m janies H dy day draper dr t 10 loi R apes parker ar K SA Sal lake fLake cit city Is 8 arson H feint salt Y laka ake guy city I 1 richard bichard howe south 43 louis iams hyams oak dah lake gi city ly i 28 hyrum yram Groe becki salt lal la P 16 city ity allan ali DO donaldson idson ar and id frea frederick cr Crowton ow t W were erb excused because they were not citizen josich H hardy handy claimed rqn because he ae was a Ae fireman maii and amael winton brinton because he e was wa enraged as aa a 4 district school P feacher fea caer to both th ware were excised i A eeron and tr erastus astas Bl cards we were ap e a no nor nerved ved by 1 ane hp office V ano and B H conk conklen in E D ellis C W beidel and failed to obey the summons the reason of the lat letters absence 0 was illness of the jurors accepted louis beggal william larabie and J W edgerly paid no taxes the first named had a part apart interest in a homestead the next owned a 9 watch and the list ast tosse possessed sed same some household goods at the close of the examination of petit jurors I 1 THO GR joiy buky fila into court cour courland tand and presented eighton of this number tt to ware statutes and afi under lander united states awl awi the he latter latte r presumably tor foi the offense of ful cohabitation the criminal calendar was then taker u up and the witnesses in the case oj di tle tae united statts states vs ishmael phillips responded to their names the defendant fd fen dant J BISHOP IStl MAEL I 1 I 1 I 1 pf af union ward was then thea called and came forward there were three i indictments against him one each for th 1883 ISM 1884 and 1885 g mr ereso fticar richards ds asked that tho the instruct the prosecutor to elect on which indictment he would proceed mr dickson dicksen after considering some time said ne he would go to trial on indictment no 33 for the year 1883 the court etien ordered that the others nos mos si 34 and 85 for 1881 an and a 1885 be dismissed the defendant then stated that he desired to withdraw his ford for d mer plea this was done and a plea of guilty to one indictment for coba bitin with his wives was made at atthe the defendants request tj sentence was set for 2 p pm in WM 11 of west jordan was next called for trial it was discovered however that belle webster erthe the alleged plural wife had not been subpoenaed as the de deputies atles had bad not been able to find her ar mr I Ickson asked wat tuat the case be continued for i the term on this ground mr richards requested that before such an order orde iwas was matte made the prosecution be requited required to altot on which of the three indictments he be would proceed this wa granted sad and t the heeme case was continued for the tevi term johie TA i 10 of ft le was as text next called there aber were four counts against this defA defendant dant and add the prosecutor pros was directed to boake ht elji choice he would go ta trial with la in calling ovet over the witnesses it was lear learned fied that emily green the Olf blural fral w ake M was vas w adl present the marshal I 1 reported 0 dr ted thit that she was on the underground uder ground tho gh be didiot did not specify from froin where the information was obtained mt mr dicon asked that the case be laid over for the term mr clebo richards Ms opposed this as it hid had b been aeu set for trial tv tf gumber cumber of times time a aud the defendant and witnesses had colne come lu in irma from 79 the co fart art ordered the ase to be bd continued sud and I 1 i WM wk j was called he had bad no counsel and informed the court that ha he desired to withdraw the p plea lea of not guilty cuilty to the one indictment against him he hd slik said it if it it is i a arlime to support my am guilty of cohabitation 01 sentence was fixed for wednesday feb and court took a recess Y until 2 p pm m the choice of mr me aloon fell on 0 n the first count inthe in the indictment mr tate and the second indictment against a ainest mr haibt gehis this at afternoon bishop phillips was called for sentence the asked whether he had to as why sentence should not be pronounced i bishop phillips 1 I have nothing to say i court t do you yon intend hereafter to obey the law or to continue to violate lt it 1 1 I 1 bishop shifts T r I do not feel fee latr I 1 have ba a emy any promise to make 1 w will 4 leave the future to itself it self i the court coart then ordered abathe be imprisoned in the penken biary tor six lix months and pay a fl fine no of and costs of the case and stand co committed until the fine and costs are paid I 1 I 1 ORY HEART keiser ot 0 ills this cit city then ca came me forward and 11 a 1 la n formed ake the court that he des desired fre d to change chance his plea of not guilty on a one count indictment to guilty court coart are you fqy deafly for sentence mr reiser Y yea es sir air court what to is your intention on as ad to the butiu future re mr reiser 4 I 1 havi have no 1 premise I wise to make I 1 hare a large fadd family eighteen defend defending g on in my wages akes for tig y 0 A short time e ago I 1 was robbed o el ray my stock of wat watches caes and last laif summer I 1 was aeck for along ti time M so that my mr financial condition is not 14 very ery good coutt court you yau will nat botsay say yoa og wil will obey the law in the futar mr beiser r could buld vat apt conscientiously S say I 1 QUI the court then imposed the toll all penally y sli six in months os Imprison imprisonment mInt and 9 A no of ind costs JOSEPH BLUNT if 4 dext and withdrew his bis plea 6 i of 0 f n not guilty to edthe the charge ol of unlawful Y 1 f 1 a i ca cohabitation hal n and made e ow 01 oj of 1 I 1 I P 1 guilty AM at the W request of bf the defendant sen sea ance I 1 was waa deferred until rpm in on moicay feb 21 0 ta 11 1 I 1 1 ota BUSINESS the attorney Att otney moved that the indictment 8 M lovendahl Lovend abl with wath taking water from fro in a public ditch be dismissed on the ground thattie that th evidence was insufficient to convict the motion was granted I 1 i Be foreJudge judge boraman ing inthe abe dase case of FW P Wes therman estherman Vs kate murtha the motion to discharge attachment was overruled E J travis vs salt lake lime and flux co on oil jurial before the court |
